Leadership, Moral Authority, and Global Climate Change

Steve Vanderheiden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014696_6

2012-01-01

Abstract:When UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called anthropogenic climate change “the defining challenge of our time,” he called upon the United States and China to “play a more constructive role” in the ongoing international climate policy development process.’ Addressing world leaders upon the release of the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and in advance of the COP-14 meetings in Bali, Indonesia, Ban hoped that his urgent plea might move international negotiations forward by imploring the world’s two largest greenhouse-gas polluting nations to lead rather than obstruct, and to contribute toward solutions to the same degree that both were contributing to the problem. To no one’s surprise, this call for climate policy leadership went unheeded, especially in the United States, where an unpopular president with a sordid history of obstructionism in domestic and international climate policy development had already abdicated all forms of constructive leadership on climate change and lacked inclination to try changing his administration’s course. Given its history on climate and energy issues, George W. Bush’s administration may not have been able to play a constructive role in Bali even if by some personal epiphany the president had decided to reverse course and take climate change mitigation seriously.