Happy Hour?, or The Cocktail Era

Lina Meruane
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394996_7
2014-01-01
Abstract:The widely trumpeted announcement that the deadly epidemic was turning into a chronic condition meant an immediate upheaval in HIV-positive writing: now that the death sentence had been suspended indefinitely, how would literature deal with the epidemic? But the pharmacological promise of 1996—the cocktail of drugs, the long-awaited happy hour—took a while to become universally available,180 and it took an equally long time for the improvement in the situation of the infected to be reflected in the literature. Many post-cocktail texts continued to gaze back on a past that still resembled the present all too closely. Even in narratives that make meticulous note of the pharmacological advances—from toxic AZT to two-drug combination therapy to tritherapy—the underlying perspective is similar to that of texts that look backward: though they certainly narrate new situations, the fear of infection and of death remains active, drifting through the texts. Argentine texts that make note of the new treatment do not see it as a relief: there pervades instead an acute anxiety about living a life whose schedule is dictated by a medical regimen.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?