Abstract:Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Ahead of Print. Many colleges utilize bystander intervention programs to address gender-based violence. The goal of these programs is to help students overcome barriers to intervention, including evaluation inhibition, which occurs when bystanders expect to be viewed negatively for intervening. We have limited information, though, on how college students evaluate bystanders who intervene. Specifically, we do not know whether evaluations of bystanders who engage in different levels of intervention vary across situations or how men and women who intervene similarly are evaluated. Without this information, it is difficult to design prevention programs that help bystanders overcome evaluation inhibition. To gather this information, we conducted a vignette experiment with college student participants (n = 82). We specifically examined how students evaluated the reasonableness of male and female bystanders who engaged in different behaviors (direct intervention and threatening to tell an authority, direct intervention only, indirect intervention, doing nothing) across four situations (assault at a party, workplace harassment, harassment by a teaching assistant, and intimate partner violence). Analyses of variance found that there was situational variability in how the bystander is evaluated for different intervention tactics, though bystanders who did nothing were always evaluated the most negatively. Bystander's gender, however, did not affect evaluations, suggesting that intervention expectations for men and women are similar. These results indicate that while there is an underlying norm supportive of intervention behavior, situational characteristics influence whether college students think it is reasonable to call authorities, confront the perpetrator, or engage in indirect intervention. The central implication of this study is that bystander intervention training should provide opportunities for students to practice intervention behaviors across a wide variety of situations of gender-based violence in order build up their store of intervention tactics, thus increasing their ability to overcome evaluation inhibition.

College Student Reporting Responses to Hypothetical and Actual Safety Concerns

Examining the reasons for student responses to threatening behaviors on a college campus.

College Student Perceptions of Campus Safety Initiatives

Adverse Consequences to Assisting Victims of Campus Violence: Initial Investigations Among College Students

Are Institutions of Higher Learning Safe? A Descriptive Study of Campus Safety Issues and Self‐Reported Campus Victimization among Male and Female College Students

The Role of Mandatory Reporting, Perpetrator and Violence Type, and Alcohol Consumption in Undergraduates' Likelihood of Disclosing Sexual Violence

What Would You Do? Strategies for Bystander Intervention to Prevent Sexual Violence by College Students

Perceptions of Campus Safety Policies: Contrasting the Views of Students with Faculty and Staff

Student perceptions of campus safety: testing the vulnerability and disorder models

An Overview of Prevalence and Behavioral Responses

What Will People Think? How College Students Evaluate Bystander Intervention Behavior

A Longitudinal Examination of Gun Reporting by Middle and High-School Students

Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students.

Severity of Coercive Sexual Harassment in Professor–Student Interaction and Peer Bystander Responses

Self-Control, Opportunity, and College Students’ Bystander Intervention in Sexually Coercive Situations

The Clery Act and Student Behavior: An Empirical Consideration

Helping Friends and Strangers in Risky Situations: Outcomes of Bystander Interventions for Sexual Assault and Dating Violence

Bystander Intervention to Abusive Behavior on Social Networking Websites

Who is responsible for campus sexual assaults? News media use, attributions of responsibility, and college students’ perceived risk and willingness to engage in preventive behaviours