Abstract:Transaction cost economics (TCE) is probably the most widely accepted theory on how firms can gain competitive advantage through efficient organization of their economic transactions. However, by focusing on the competitive environment in which companies operate, it abstracts from the cultural context in which governance decisions are made. We study the cultural boundedness of TCE using two seminal cultural theories: the political science/sociology framework of Inglehart and the management science framework of Hofstede. We use these theories to develop (main-effect) hypotheses about the cultural contexts in which TCE has higher predictive power as well as (interaction) hypotheses regarding particular cultural contexts that may inherently be more inclined than others to adopt certain non-market governance modes if the market “fails.” Hypotheses are tested using a meta-analysis on data collected from 128 studies from 12 countries on 3 continents, representing governance decisions of 60,926 companies. We find that TCE is a universal theory across all cultural contexts. This being said, we find that in societies low on power distance and in societies characterized by a strong emphasis on secular-rational and self-expression values, companies are more strongly guided in their governance decisions by economic, transaction-cost considerations than companies in societies high on power distance and in countries that are characterized by traditional and survival values. Further, TCE’s power to predict the specific type of non-market governance employed by the firm is systematically moderated by the national culture in which the firm operates. The power of TCE for predicting hierarchical governance is higher in countries that rate high on secular-rational values and on uncertainty avoidance and low on long-term orientation, whereas TCE is more diagnostic for predicting relational governance in countries high on self-expression values and low on power distance and on uncertainty avoidance. In sum, our meta-analysis provides support for our thesis that to fully understand governance choices made by firms, we need to integrate TCE and cultural theory. While managers around the world are guided by economic considerations, the cultural context in which they operate exerts a substantial—and predictable—contingent effect on their governance choices.

A Transaction Cost Theory of the TNC

TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

Transaction cost economics and the roles of national culture: a test of hypotheses based on Inglehart and Hofstede

The Nature of TNCs ——the Power of Freedom or Monoply in Globalized Economy

The Nature of the Market:From an Invisible Hand to a Tangible Network

The Interaction between the Investment Behavior of Transnational Corporations and the International Political and Economic System

FEATURES OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS, THEIR ROLE IN THE WORLD ECONOMY

Transaction cost economics and business administration

Multinational Corporations in Transnational Networks: Theoretical and Regulatory Challenges in Historical Perspective

On the role of transnational corporations in modern integration and globalization processes

Networks of Free Trade Agreements among Heterogeneous Countries

Global Production Networks and the Private Organization of World Trade

Management of transaction costs of enterprises

Information technology and transnational integration: Theory and evidence on the evolution of the modern multinational enterprise

PRINCIPLES OF TERRITORIAL DISTRIBUTION OF TNCS THROUGH ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS AT THE GLOBAL LEVEL

Small and medium-sized transnational corporations: Salient features

Multinational Enterprises in the New Europe:

The Importance of Being Trusted: Transaction Costs and Policy Network Theory

Transaction cost theory: past, present and future

Trade policy in a “GVC World”: Multinational corporations and trade liberalization

The double role of GDP in shaping the structure of the International Trade Network