Abstract:Because of incomplete information on pre-sold products, consumers face uncertainty about the value of what they have purchased, which leads to a mismatch between supply and demand and a large number of returns. By developing appropriate return policies and effectively managing and handling consumer returns, retailers can not only reduce waste but also ensure better resource utilization, which is essential for sustainable development. In this paper, we analyze the full-refund and full-and-freight-refund policies of retailers and develop a game model based on binary competition for selecting the optimal return policy for the pre-sold products of two retailers. The study shows that when both retailers have low capacity, there is no pre-sale stage. However, when their combined capacity is high and exceeds the demand of non-strategic consumers, equilibrium depends on their combined capacity and the proportion of strategic consumers who choose to keep the pre-purchased product under both return policies. When the number of strategic consumers who retain pre-order products is low under the full-refund policy and both retailers have moderate capacity, equilibrium is achieved when an asymmetric return policy is followed rather than a symmetric return policy. Specifically, when the percentage of strategic consumers who keep their reserved products under the product return strategy is small and the capacity of the two retailers is moderate, the maximum benefit is achieved if one of the retailers adopts the policy of a full refund and the other adopts the policy of a full-and-freight refund. Otherwise, when one retailer adopts the policy of a full refund or a full-and-freight refund, its competitor should adopt the same strategy to gain maximum revenue. The research on retailers’ pre-sale and return strategies in this paper helps to optimize the operational strategies and operational processes of e-retailers, further improve the management and decision making of their joint pre-sale and return strategies, and help optimize retailers’ profits.

Returns Freight Insurance Policy and the Impact from a BOPS Retailer

Will Providing Return-Freight-Insurances Do More Good than Harm to Dual-Channel E-Commerce Retailers?

Return freight insurance strategies for the online retailer and insurance company

The Impact of Return Shipping Insurance on a Retailer Based on Restricting Rights

Return Freight Insurance Strategy and Price Decisions for a Dual-Channel Supply Chain in the Presence of Showrooming

Optimal Return Policy of Competitive Retailers’ Pre-Sale Products Based on Strategic Consumer Behavior

Demand Pooling in Omnichannel Operations

False failure returns: Optimal pricing and return policies in a dual-channel supply chain

The optimal decision of e-retailer based on return-freight insurance – considering the loss aversion of customers

Optimal Shipping Strategy and Return Service Charge under No-Reason Return Policy in Online Retailing

Optimal return shipping insurance policy with consumers' anticipated regret

Return Freight Insurance Strategy and Price Decisionsfor a Dual-channel Supply Chain in the Presence of Showrooming

Pricing and Return Strategy Selection of Online Retailers Considering Consumer Purchasing Behavior

Collection Responsibility and Freight Insurance Strategies for an E-Tailing Supply Chain in the Presence of Managerial Optimism

Consumer Return Policies in Omnichannel Operations

Consumer return policies in presence of a P2P market

Returns policy, in-store service, and contract strategies in the presence of customer returns

Return insurance in a competitive market: Benefiting the high-quality or low-quality retailer?

Retailer' s return policy based on strategic consumer behavior

Return freight strategies and selling formats in e-commerce supply chain: The perspective of consumer fairness concerns and online shopping returns

Optimal Pricing and Return-Freight Insurance: Strategic Analysis of E -Sellers in the Presence of Reputation Differentiation