Predictors of depressive symptoms in college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
Yan Liu,Ning Zhang,Guangyi Bao,Yubei Huang,Bingyuan Ji,Yili Wu,Chuanxin Liu,Gongying Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.084
2019-02-01
Abstract:Background: To explore predictors of depressive symptoms in college students. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the predictors of depressive symptoms. PubMed/Medline, Embase, Springerlink, EBSCOhost, Cochrane review, PsycINFO, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Weipu database and Wanfang database were searched for cohort or longitudinal studies. Stata version 13.1 was used for statistical meta-analysis. Results: Among 30 cohort studies, 24 studies covering 25,154 college students with the NOS of 6 and over were selected for systematic review and 15 studies met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The predictors of depressive symptoms in college students were gender, baseline depression, neuroticism or psychoticism, negative automatic thoughts or negative rumination, dysfunctional attitude, childhood abuse, sex abuse, and stressful life events. The combined risk ratios and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of each previous predictors were 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.21), 1.28 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.45), 1.25 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.45), 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01,1.05), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.29), 1.05(95% CI: 1.02,1.08), 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00,1.02), and 1.16 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.27), respectively. Perceived social support and family function did not displayed significant predictive effects. Funnel plots showed that publication bias was possible. Limitations: Screening tools for depressive symptoms do not have the power or specificity of the gold standard measures for depression like the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) or the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which would influence the study validity and the combined estimates. Conclusions: Specific biological, psychological and environmental factors contribute to depressive symptoms in college students. Consideration of these prognostic factors might be conducive to improve understanding and management of future interventions against depressive symptoms among college students. Due to the highly sophisticated course of depression, it is crucial to summarize theoretical frameworks for depressive symptom interventions among college students.