Abstract:Abstract Due process of law is not just a right. As a constitutional principle, it extends to some basic human rights and freedoms, with which legal procedures are carried out. It is a guarantee of vital importance in any democratic society, the responsibility for ensuring which falls on the justice system. The right to due legal process is characterized by duality. On the one hand, it is presented as a guarantee for every citizen against the unjust actions of state authorities and on the other hand it constitutes an obligation not to violate the rights of citizens without a regular legal procedure. In order to make the protection of basic human rights and freedoms as efficient as possible, the constitutional legislator has provided legal means of constitutional control. The control exercised by the Constitutional Court, when the individual claims the violation of this principle, also appears in the form of a fundamental right in itself and becomes possible through an individual constitutional appeal. Respect for due legal process according to the Constitution is sanctioned by article 42 of the Constitution of Albania where “ freedom, property and rights recognized by the Constitution and by law cannot be violated without due process of law .” This provision obliges all public authorities to respect freedom and other human rights. As a guarantee for a due legal process, every person has the right for his case to be heard in a due, public, legal process and within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal, established by law, which shall decide both disputes concerning his rights and obligations of a civil nature, as well as for the validity of any criminal charges against him .” Article 15 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania provides that basic human rights and freedoms are indivisible, inviolable and underlie the entire legal order. Based on the constitution, during the criminal process, everyone has the right to be informed immediately and in detail about the accusation against him, about his rights, as well as to be given the opportunity to notify his family or relatives. Everyone has the right to defend himself or with the help of a legal defense lawyer of his choice, to communicate freely and privately with him and to be provided with free defense when he/she does not have sufficient means. The right of defense must be real and its exercise must not be hindered, but the courts must take all legal measures in function of the fair process in order to give the individual the opportunity to defend himself in compliance with the principle of equality of arms, creating the opportunity for the accused to familiarize himself with the materials, evidence and results of the investigation in advance, to prepare and to exercise an effective defense with arguments in his favor in order to oppose the charge brought. Each party must be given a reasonable opportunity to present its case, under conditions, which do not place it in a less favorable position vis-à-vis the opponent. Main objective of this manuscript is the right of defense of the individual during the change of the legal qualification of the criminal offense, analyzing the criteria for its realization in the ordinary trial and further specifically in the trial.

Part I State Obligations and Rights Protected, Ch.II Civil and Political Rights, Art.25: Right to Judicial Protection

Part I State Obligations and Rights Protected, Ch.II Civil and Political Rights, Art.24: Right to Equal Protection

Part I State Obligations and Rights Protected, Ch.II Civil and Political Rights, Art.3: Right to Juridical Personality

Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VII Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, s.2 Functions, Article 41

Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.3 Procedure, Article 69

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Constitutional protection of the right of citizenship in criminal legislation

INCONVENCIONALIDAD DEL AMPARO MEXICANO POR LA EFICACIA EN LA PROTECCIÓN JUDICIAL DE DERECHOS HUMANOS

NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PARIS PRINCIPLES, ENGAGED INTO THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE SYSTEM OF INTERNAL MEANS OF SECURITY

Ensuring the exercise of the right to access to justice as a mandatory attribute of a constitutional state

Part III General International Law, Ch.27 Remedies

Subj ectuve Requurements and Obj ectuve Facts:Cuvul Trual Under Protectuon of Human Rughts

Historical aspects of the establishment of the institution of child rights protection in international law

The Common Approach to Article 1: The Scope of Each State’s Obligation to Ensure Respect for the Geneva Conventions

THE PRINCIPLE OF PROTECTION OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

The Law of International Human Rights Protection

The change in the legal classification of the criminal offense and the right to defense in the trial

From a Directive Principle to a Fundamental Right

Giving individual remedies in social rights litigation their due

Implementation of Legal Guarantees for Human Rights Protection in Indonesia

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF FAIR TRIAL RIGHTS AS A FORM OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN THE INDONESIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM