Abstract:Since No Child Left Behind was signed into law, test-based accountability has become a core feature of the K-12 public education system in the United States. The approach, it would seem, is here to stay. Yet that is not to say that anything resembling a consensus has emerged. Over the past twenty years, critics have continued to raise questions about the theory of change underlying test-based accountability, and scholars have detailed a variety of unintended consequences associated with it. If test-based accountability is both likely to persist and imperfect in its design, then it is critical to consider how its shortcomings might be addressed. In service of that aim, and in keeping with the mission of this feature, this Policy Dialogue explores future possibilities by starting, first, with a look at the past. In this particular case, participants were asked to address one simple question: "What have we learned from two decades of high-stakes testing?" As regular readers of HEQ are aware, these dialogues usually feature a historian in conversation with a scholar or practitioner from the world of policy. In this case, the choice of Diane Ravitch was a natural one, particularly given the fact that she is a member of HEQ's editorial board. A research professor at New York University, she is also a former assistant US secretary of education and the author of several books about measurement and accountability. Rather than select a single interlocutor, however, the editors chose to pair her with three leaders who represent the broad range of viewpoints in the field: Denise Forte, Princess Moss, and Paul Reville. Denise Forte is the interim CEO of The Education Trust. She brings to our conversation twenty years of experience in congressional staff roles, including as the staff director for the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Princess Moss is vice president of the National Education Association and cochair of the NEA's task force on measurement and accountability. In prior work with the NEA's Executive Committee, she helped develop the group's position on reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act—from NCLB to the Every Student Succeeds Act. Paul Reville is the Francis Keppel Professor of Practice of Educational Policy and Administration at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and former secretary of education for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Nearly a decade before the passage of NCLB, he played a key role in the development of the Massachusetts Education Reform Act of 1993, which instituted standards-based accountability across the state. HEQ Policy Dialogues are, by design, intended to promote an informal, free exchange of ideas between scholars. At the end of the exchange, we offer a list of references for readers who wish to follow up on sources relevant to the discussion.

Borrowing legitimacy as English learner (EL) leaders: Indiana’s 14-year history with English language proficiency standards

Moving educational policy to educators’ lived reality: One state’s trickle-down, bottom-up pathway to literacy intervention reform

Standards-to-Standards Linkage Under Title III: Exploring Common Language Demands in ELD and Science Standards

Bridging Local Needs and National Standards: Use of Standards-Based Individualized Feedback of an In-House EFL Listening Test in China

The Education of English Language Learners in Arizona: A History of Underachievement

Teachers’ Perceptions of the Implementation of the Literacy Common Core State Standards for English Language Learners and Students With Disabilities

Identity Texts and Literacy Development among Preschool English Language Learners: Enhancing Learning Opportunities for Children at Risk for Learning Disabilities

Achieving excellence: Bringing effective literacy pedagogy to scale in Ontario’s publicly-funded education system

An Analysis of Three States' Alignment between Language Arts and Mathematics Standards and Alternate Assessments

Policy Dialogue: Twenty Years of Test-Based Accountability

Power relations in the enactment of English language education policy for Chinese schools

Academic and English language outcomes for DLLs as a function of school bilingual education model: the role of two-way immersion and home language support

English as an additional language – a genealogy of language-in-education policies and reflections on research trajectories

Unraveling high school English literature pedagogic practices: a Legitimation Code Theory analysis

Relations of English and Heritage Language Proficiency to Response Inhibition and Attention Shifting in Dual Language Learners in Head Start

Learning about English learners: teachers’ and leaders’ perceptions of effective professional development

Clashing Roles and Identities of EL Teachers during Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning

Perceptions of English Language Learners—Teacher Beliefs, Professional Development and Student Outcomes: A Literature Review

Evidence-Based Practices for Evaluating Preschoolers Who Are Deaf/Hard of Hearing Using Listening and Spoken Language for Special Education Eligibility

Early Reading Intervention for English Language Learners At-Risk for Learning Disabilities: Student and Teacher Outcomes in an Urban School

Disabling language practices: discursive constructions of children in individual education plan resource documents