Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates

Anders Eklund,Thomas E. Nichols,Hans Knutsson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602413113
IF: 11.1
2016-06-28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Functional MRI (fMRI) is 25 years old, yet surprisingly its most common statistical methods have not been validated using real data. Here, we used resting-state fMRI data from 499 healthy controls to conduct 3 million task group analyses. Using this null data with different experimental designs, we estimate the incidence of significant results. In theory, we should find 5% false positives (for a significance threshold of 5%), but instead we found that the most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%. These results question the validity of a number of fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of weakly significant neuroimaging results.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?