Abstract:The use of enteral nutrition (EN) in the critically-ill patient makes necessary to evaluate its effectiveness and impact on achieving the target requirements. Gastrically administered EN has a high complication rate, especially increased residue that leads to hyponutrition. The use of the small bowel (jejunum) may achieve greater administered volume, although there are three aspects that directly influence on its use: intestinal access route, motility and absorptive capability, and barrier function. The selection of the access route to the digestive tube has to be done after evaluating the underlying disease and predicted duration of EN. If it is greater than 4-6 weeks a definitive access will be performed through an invasive technique of ostomy (radiologic, endoscopic or surgical jejunostomy) and if it is shorter than 4-6 weeks, an endoscopic, fluoroscopic or ultrasonographic non-invasive or transnasal technique (naso-duodenal, or nasojejunal) will be used. By protocoling procedures and experiences, it has been shown that jejunal nutrition may achieve an increase in the amount of requirements administerd to critically-ill patients with mechanical ventilation as compared to gastric feeding, although the benefits with regards to reducing the number of infectious complications, hospital stay and mortality are not so clear-cut, so that it should be left to those cases in which gastric feeding has been clearly documented. By using the manometrich technique or the acetaminophen absorption tests it has been shown that 50% of critically-ill patients with mechanical ventilation have gastric antral hypomotility with decreased migratory motor complexes and gastric voiding, which considerably hampers nutrition. Under normal circumstances, during fasting, there are regular motor contractions, or an inter-digestive migratory motor complex which pattern prevents nutrient absorption because of being highly propulsive, so that during the nutrient phase, this pattern changes into the postprandial pattern with an irregular and continuous contraction activity, with no activity centers, which is much more adapted to nutrient absorption. In critically-ill patients, this normal propulsive pattern is lost, the postprandial pattern is frequently lost, and the inter-digestive pattern remains, which prevents enteral feeding. There are several factors that have an impact on this change, mainly the underlying disease, sepsis, head trauma, mechanical ventilation, sedation, and muscle relaxation. The use of pro-kinetic agents such as metoclopramide may, at least theoretically, modify motility impainment and facilitate the correct administration of prescribed requirements. Among other functions, the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) has a barrier function between inner and outer media, which prevents bacteria, antigenic agents, and toxicants from entering the blood. Its failure is characterized by decreased nutrient absorption, impaired intestinal immunological response and increased intestinal permeability (IP). Among the hypothesis trying to explain systemic infection and multiorgan failure (MOF), there is precisely anatomical and functional integrity of the intestinal mucosa. Mucosal impairment with increased IP has been shown in burn patients, polytrauma, major surgery, hematopoietic cell transplantation, and sepsis, although its relationship with bacterial translocation has not clearly been established. Before the evidences that link the GIT with MOF, the monitoring methods aimed at early correction of splaenic hypoperfusion focus on the mechanisms implicated in increased IP.

Tolerability of Enteral Nutrition in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock Who Require Vasopressors

Tolerability of Enteral Nutrition in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock Who Require Vasopressors

Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patient With Septic Shock Requiring Vasopressor: Case Report

Early Trophic Enteral Nutrition Is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock

Early Enteral Nutrition Tolerance in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support

When Can We Start Early Enteral Nutrition Safely in Patients with Shock on Vasopressors?

A more physiological feeding process in ICU: Intermittent infusion with semi-solid nutrients (CONSORT-compliant).

Early Enteral Nutrition Support Dose Selection in Critically Ill Patients: a Meta Analysis

Early Enteral Nutrition (within 48 h) for Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Early Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients with Hemodynamic Instability

Enteral nutrition in septic shock: A pathophysiologic conundrum.

Association of Vasopressors Dose Trajectories with Enteral Nutrition Tolerance in Patients with Shock: A Prospective Observational Study

Safety and Outcomes of Early Enteral Nutrition in Circulatory Shock

Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability: an evidence-based review and practical advice.

Nutritional Intake in Children with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

INITIATION TIMING OF VASOPRESSOR IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial

Parenteral Nutrition: Current Use, Complications, and Nutrition Delivery in Critically Ill Patients

Factors associated with the need of parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients after the initiation of enteral nutrition therapy

[Enteral access and intestinal function assessment in the critically ill patient]

Early enteral nutrition in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest under target temperature management was associated with a lower 7-day bacteremia rate: a post-hoc analysis of a retrospective cohort study