Responsiveness and convergent validity of QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L in assessing short-term quality of life following esophagectomy
Norma B Bulamu,Ravi Vissapragada,Gang Chen,Julie Ratcliffe,Louise A Mudge,B Mark Smithers,Elizabeth A Isenring,Lorelle Smith,Glyn G Jamieson,David I Watson,Australian Immunonutrition Study Group,Justin Bessell,Andrew Barbour,Ahmad Aly,Stephen Archer,Mohammed Ballal,Jessica Barbon,Katie Benton,Melissa Bond,Melissa Berryman,Tim Bright,Richard Cade,Anna Cardamis,Rosemary Carroll,Kara Cashman,Larissa Chan,Brooke Chapman,Sally Chapman,Derek Chen,Jacob Chisholm,Wendy Davidson,Peter Devitt,Cuong Dong,Ra'eesa Doola,Suzanne Edwards,Krishna Epari,Maree Farley,Julie Farrow,Maree Ferguson,David Fletcher,Kerry Forbes,Katherine Fullerton,Philip Game,Susan Gan,David Gotley,Belinda Gout,Jodi Gray,Susan Heaney,Mary Anne Johnson,Megan Johnstone,Sanjeeva Kariyawasam,Jonathan Karnon,Amber Kelaart,Liz Kellett,Erin Kennedy,Rhiannon Krane,Sylvia Lemass,Jenelle Loeliger,Andrew Lord,John Ludbrook,Catherine McFarlane,Michelle McPhee,Selena Yue-Xian Ooi,Leonie Pearce,Kate Pettigrew,Emma Putrus,Georgina Rassias,Alison Shanks,Jon Shenfine,Emma Louise Smith,Justin Singleton,Rebecca Lindstrom-Sowman,John Spillane,Liliana Sputore,Belinda Steer,Tom Sullivan,Laisa Teleni,Deb Tolcher,Janine Thomas,Sarah Thompson,Tina Thorpe,Cheryl Watterson,Vanessa Wills,Anita Wilton,Kellie Wright,Tim Wright
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01867-w
2021-10-02
Abstract:Aim: This study assessed the responsiveness and convergent validity of two preference-based measures; the newly developed cancer-specific EORTC Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) relative to the generic three-level version of the EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) in evaluating short-term health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes after esophagectomy. Methods: Participants were enrolled in a multicentre randomised controlled trial to determine the impact of preoperative and postoperative immunonutrition versus standard nutrition in patients with esophageal cancer. HRQoL was assessed seven days before and 42 days after esophagectomy. Standardized Response Mean and Effect Size were calculated to assess responsiveness. Ceiling effects for each dimension were calculated as the proportion of the best level responses for that dimension at follow-up/post-operatively. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation and the level of agreement was explored using Bland-Altman plots. Results: Data from 164 respondents (mean age: 63 years, 81% male) were analysed. HRQoL significantly reduced on both measures with large effect sizes (> 0.80), and a greater mean difference (0.29 compared to 0.16) on QLU-C10D. Both measures had ceiling effects (> 15%) on all dimensions at baseline. Following esophagectomy, ceiling effects were observed with self-care (86%), mobility (67%), anxiety/depression (55%) and pain/discomfort (19%) dimensions on EQ-5D-3L. For QLU-C10D ceiling effects were observed with emotional function (53%), physical function (16%), nausea (35%), sleep (31%), bowel problems (21%) and pain (20%). A strong correlation (r = 0.71) was observed between EQ-5D-3L anxiety and QLU-C10D emotional function dimensions. Good agreement (3.7% observations outside the limits of agreement) was observed between the utility scores. Conclusion: The QLU-C10D is comparable to the more widely applied generic EQ-5D-3L, however, QLU-C10D was more sensitive to short-term utility changes following esophagectomy. Cognisant of requirements by policy makers to apply generic utility measures in cost effectiveness studies, the disease-specific QLU-C10D should be used alongside the generic measures like EQ-5D-3L. Trial registration: The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12611000178943) on the 15th of February 2011.