Abstract:Reaction optimization is fundamental to synthetic chemistry, from optimizing the yield of industrial processes to selecting conditions for the preparation of medicinal candidates<a href="/articles/s41586-021-03213-y#ref-CR1">1</a>. Likewise, parameter optimization is omnipresent in artificial intelligence, from tuning virtual personal assistants to training social media and product recommendation systems<a href="/articles/s41586-021-03213-y#ref-CR2">2</a>. Owing to the high cost associated with carrying out experiments, scientists in both areas set numerous (hyper)parameter values by evaluating only a small subset of the possible configurations. Bayesian optimization, an iterative response surface-based global optimization algorithm, has demonstrated exceptional performance in the tuning of machine learning models<a href="/articles/s41586-021-03213-y#ref-CR3">3</a>. Bayesian optimization has also been recently applied in chemistry<a href="#ref-CR4">4</a>,<a href="#ref-CR5">5</a>,<a href="#ref-CR6">6</a>,<a href="#ref-CR7">7</a>,<a href="#ref-CR8">8</a>,<a href="/articles/s41586-021-03213-y#ref-CR9">9</a>; however, its application and assessment for reaction optimization in synthetic chemistry has not been investigated. Here we report the development of a framework for Bayesian reaction optimization and an open-source software tool that allows chemists to easily integrate state-of-the-art optimization algorithms into their everyday laboratory practices. We collect a large benchmark dataset for a palladium-catalysed direct arylation reaction, perform a systematic study of Bayesian optimization compared to human decision-making in reaction optimization, and apply Bayesian optimization to two real-world optimization efforts (Mitsunobu and deoxyfluorination reactions). Benchmarking is accomplished via an online game that links the decisions made by expert chemists and engineers to real experiments run in the laboratory. Our findings demonstrate that Bayesian optimization outperforms human decisionmaking in both average optimization efficiency (number of experiments) and consistency (variance of outcome against initially available data). Overall, our studies suggest that adopting Bayesian optimization methods into everyday laboratory practices could facilitate more efficient synthesis of functional chemicals by enabling better-informed, data-driven decisions about which experiments to run.

Bayesian optimization for chemical products and functional materials

Bayesian Optimisation for Sequential Experimental Design with Applications in Additive Manufacturing

Practical Path-based Bayesian Optimization

Bayesian Optimization in Materials Science: A Survey

Bayesian optimization with adaptive surrogate models for automated experimental design

An Integrated Method of Bayesian Optimization and D-Optimal Design for Chemical Experiment Optimization

Race to the bottom: Bayesian optimisation for chemical problems

Bayesian optimization as a flexible and efficient design framework for sustainable process systems

Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis

Diagnosing and fixing common problems in Bayesian optimization for molecule design

Web-BO: towards increased accessibility of Bayesian optimisation (BO) for chemistry

CAPBO: A Cost‐aware Parallelized Bayesian Optimization Method for Chemical Reaction Optimization

Ranking over Regression for Bayesian Optimization and Molecule Selection

Adaptive Representation of Molecules and Materials in Bayesian Optimization

Batched Bayesian optimization with correlated candidate uncertainties

Process Quality Control Through Bayesian Optimization with Adaptive Local Convergence

Cost-Informed Bayesian Reaction Optimization

Enhanced Bayesian Optimization via Preferential Modeling of Abstract Properties

Bayesian prediction for physical models with application to the optimization of the synthesis of pharmaceutical products using chemical kinetics

Human-algorithm collaborative Bayesian optimization for engineering systems