Abstract:No one enjoys grading, neither instructors nor students. The idea is that grades provide the required incentive to learn and act as an "objective" form of evaluation. This view is especially prevalent in STEM, where practitioners pride themselves in quantitative and objective measurements. However, the science of learning tells us that grades and ranking increase competition and stress, pushing learners to engage in tasks regardless of their effectiveness. Grades have been shown to suppress interest in learning, incentivize engagement in easier tasks, and produce shallower thinking. If wanting to learn is something students and faculty can agree on, how do we get there without grading? From psychology research, we know that feedback, separated from grades, along with opportunities to reattempt work without negative consequence, are powerful drivers of the intrinsic motivation to learn. In fact, feedback loops—trying something new, getting feedback, and making changes based on feedback - are a known developmental pathway to authentic learning. In this article, I describe an experiment with a form of ungrading that involves students in the co-creation of self-assessment criteria. The goal is to create learning feedback loops, incentivize learning for learning's sake, and give students some agency in the process of evaluation. This was conducted in an upper division Immunology course at a small liberal arts college. This paper outlines an iterative and dialogical process between students and instructional staff to craft a holistic set of criteria for the evaluation of learning. These criteria became the foundation for regular one-on-one conversations with students and a means to track progress over the semester. End-of-semester student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, citing increased motivation to learn, lower levels of anxiety, a less competitive environment, and growth as a learner. Among the few disadvantages cited were anxieties from grade ambiguity, fears about the process, and extra time, especially for the instructor. This paper highlights the ways in which this system aligns with psychosocial theories of learning, fostering an intrinsic motivation to learn utilizing principles of critical pedagogy and students as partners. It concludes with lessons learned from both the student and instructor viewpoint.

Reframing How Grading Affects and Shapes Students’ Self-Worth in Christian Higher Education

Fostering student agency and motivation: co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course

Self‐worth Protection: review and implications for the classroom

Religious Doubts and the Problem with Religious Pressures for Christian Students

Students’ self-worth protection and approaches to learning in higher education: predictors and consequences

The challenge of finding noncontingent, universal worth for elite U.S. college students

Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well-being, and society

No grades in higher education now! Revisiting the place of graded assessment in the reimagination of the public university

Christian Worldview as a Critical Information Literacy Lens: A Synthesis of the CCCU Commitments and the ACRL Framework

The Strengths of People in Low-SES Positions: An Identity-Reframing Intervention Improves Low-SES Students' Achievement Over One Semester

The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education

Professional formation and deformation: repression of personal values and qualities in medical education

Anxiety, Guilt, and Shame in the Atonement

Dialogic Problematization of Academic Integrity Education

Annoyance and frustration: Emotional responses to being assessed in higher education

Writing on the Margins: The Concept of Literacy in Higher Education

Supporting Students on the (Academic) Margins: An Equity-Driven Framework

Exploring the Emotional Responses of Undergraduate Students to Assessment Feedback: Implications for Instructors

Bridging Bible and Biology: The Impact of Faith Integration on the Spiritual Growth of Students in Christian Higher Education

Assessing reflection in English enhancement courses: teachers’ views and development of a holistic framework