Abstract:Shifting levels of E proteins and Id factors are pivotal in T cell commitment and differentiation, both in the thymus and in the periphery. Id2 and Id3 are two different factors that prevent E proteins from binding to their target gene cis-regulatory sequences and inducing gene expression. Although they use the same mechanism to suppress E protein activity, Id2 and Id3 play very different roles in T cell development and CD4 T cell differentiation. Id2 imposes an irreversible choice in early T cell precursors between innate and adaptive lineages, which can be thought of as a railway switch that directs T cells down one path or another. By contrast, Id3 acts in a transient fashion downstream of extracellular signals such as T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. TCR-dependent Id3 upregulation results in the dislodging of E proteins from their target sites while chromatin remodeling occurs. After the cessation of Id3 expression, E proteins can reassemble in the context of a new genomic landscape and molecular context that allows induction of different E protein target genes. To describe this mode of action, we have developed the "Clutch" model of differentiation. In this model, Id3 upregulation in response to TCR signaling acts as a clutch that stops E protein activity ("clutch in") long enough to allow shifting of the genomic landscape into a different "gear", resulting in accessibility to different E protein target genes once Id3 decreases ("clutch out") and E proteins can form new complexes on the DNA. While TCR signal strength and cytokine signaling play a role in both peripheral and thymic lineage decisions, the remodeling of chromatin and E protein target genes appears to be more heavily influenced by the cytokine milieu in the periphery, whereas the outcome of Id3 activity during T cell development in the thymus appears to depend more on the TCR signal strength. Thus, while the Clutch model applies to both CD4 T cell differentiation and T cell developmental transitions within the thymus, changes in chromatin accessibility are modulated by biased inputs in these different environments. New emerging technologies should enable a better understanding of the molecular events that happen during these transitions, and how they fit into the gene regulatory networks that drive T cell development and differentiation.

The transcriptional regulators Id2 and Id3 control the formation of distinct memory CD8+ T cell subsets

Regulatory dendritic cells program generation of interleukin-4–producing alternative memory CD4 T cells with suppressive activity

Id3 and Id2 Act As a Dual Safety Mechanism in Regulating the Development and Population Size of Innate-Like Γδ T Cells.

Transcriptional Programming of Dendritic Cells for Enhanced MHC Class II Antigen Presentation

Id2 expression delineates differential checkpoints in the genetic program of CD8α+ and CD103+ dendritic cell lineages.

The transcription regulator ID3 maintains tumor-specific memory CD8+ T cells in draining lymph nodes during tumorigenesis

Id1 expression promotes T regulatory cell differentiation by facilitating TCR costimulation.

Id Proteins Suppress E2A-driven Innate-Like T Cell Development Prior to TCR Selection

E2A-regulated epigenetic landscape promotes memory CD8 T cell differentiation

The molecular basis of the memory T cell response: differential gene expression and its epigenetic regulation

IL-10-IL-21-STAT3 Axis Regulates Memory CD8 T Cell Development (110.9)

Molecular regulation of effector and memory T cell differentiation

Shifting gears: Id3 enables recruitment of E proteins to new targets during T cell development and differentiation

Control of the Differentiation of Regulatory T Cells and TH17 Cells by the DNA-binding Inhibitor Id3

The Transcription Factor Zfp335 Promotes Differentiation and Persistence of Memory CD8+ T Cells by Regulating TCF-1

Reversible, tunable epigenetic silencing of TCF1 generates flexibility in the T cell memory decision

Id1 Expression Promotes Peripheral Cd4(+) T Cell Proliferation and Survival Upon Tcr Activation Without Co-Stimulation

The E-Id Axis Instructs Adaptive Versus Innate Lineage Cell Fate Choice and Instructs Regulatory T Cell Differentiation

Id1 expression in CD4 T cells promotes differentiation and function of follicular helper T cells and upregulation of related functional molecules

Id Proteins Suppress E2A-Driven Invariant Natural Killer T Cell Development Prior to TCR Selection

Effector and memory CD8+ T cell fate coupled by T-bet and eomesodermin