Abstract:There is continuing controversy about the management of patients presenting with a TIA or minor stroke who are found to have occlusive disease of the carotid or vertebral arteries. Even the widespread belief in the value of carotid endarterectomy for accessible stenotic lesions has yet to be supported by a satisfactory clinical trial. There is still more uncertainty about the role of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery, although this procedure is now being widely practised in a variety of clinical circumstances. A large proportion of patients considered for EC-IC bypass have complete occlusion of an internal carotid artery (ICA), often associated with continuing symptoms referable to the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere. These delayed ischemic episodes beyond an occluded ICA may still be explained by embolic mechanisms in many cases (Barnett 1978; Countee et al. 1980; Finklestein et al. 1980). However, in a minority of patients the clinical features are highly suggestive of a hemodynamic rather than an embolic circulatory disturbance (Shanbrom and Levy 1957; Baron et al. 1981; Stark and Wodak 1983). Ischemic events of this type, resulting from a state of critically reduced cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), provide one of the few convincing arguments in favor of EC-IC bypass surgery. Since the majority of patients’ symptoms cannot be conveniently classified as being either embolic or hemodynamic in origin, an indirect assessment of regional CPP, and hence residual circulatory reserve, would clearly be of value.

Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow, Blood Volume, and Oxygen Utilization in Patients with Extracranial Vascular Disease