Abstract:In recent years, several studies have consistently reported robust form–orthographic priming effects when primes and targets shared the identity of individual letters but in a different order (e.g., gadren priming garden). Masked priming with transposed letters was reported in several Indo-European languages such as English (e. The finding that robust form–orthographic priming can be obtained even with changes in letter order has revolutionized the mod-eling of visual word recognition. It presented immense difficulties for slot-based coding computational models, which encode letter position in absolute terms—for example , the interactive activation (IA) model by McClel-land and Rumelhart (1981) or the dual-route cascaded (DRC) model by Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, and Ziegler (2001). Consequently, a new generation of computational models that focus on context-sensitive coding of relative letter position has emerged (e. for a discussion). Perhaps the most dramatic demonstration of how reading is resilient to letter transposition is the following paragraph that has been circulating via the Internet, especially in the reading research community: Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. We should note upfront that the original text does not refer to any true research project that was ever conducted at the University of Cambridge. We cannot know precisely why the author who drafted the above paragraph chose the name " Cambridge University effect " for this phenomenon that effectively demonstrates the impact of jumbled letters, or lack of such impact, and the name has stuck. Since its first appearance in 2003, the Cambridge Univesity effect has become somewhat of an urban legend. Apparently the original demonstration of the effect of letter randomization on skilled reading (or rather lack of it) belongs to Rawlinson, 1976 (and see Rawlinson, 1999, for a reference to it). In an unpublished dissertation, he showed that letter randomization in the middle of the word had little effect on the ability of skilled readers to understand the printed text (see Davis, 2003, for a web page devoted to the effect). A recent study monitoring eye movements showed that, indeed, some transpositions are easy to read, …

Transposed-letter priming effects with masked subset primes: A re-examination of the “relative position priming constraint”

Word meanings survive visual crowding: evidence from ERPs

A reexamination of consonant-vowel differences in masked transposed letter priming effects in the lexical decision task.

The Effect of Pronunciation on Interaction Between Bi-languages at Lexical Level

Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries

Phonological priming effects with same-script primes and targets in the masked priming same-different task

The Effect of Long-Term Semantic Memory on Subliminal Priming

Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect?

The Effect of Letter Transposition on Reading Is Attracting Significant Attention in Visual Word Recognition Research. the Impact of Letter Transposition on Reading English and Hebrew

Syntactic Priming in Illiterate and Literate Older Chinese Adults

Opposite ERP Effects for Conscious and Unconscious Semantic Processing under Continuous Flash Suppression

A behavioral database for masked form priming

Language Dominance Modulates Transposed-Letter N400 Priming Effects in Bilinguals

Masked transposition priming effects are observed in Korean in the same-different task

Consonant and vowel transposition effects during reading development: A study on Italian children and adults

Sand, Sandpaper, and Sandwiches: Evidence From a Masked Compound Priming Task in L1 and L2 Speakers of English

Separating the FN400 and N400 event-related potential components in masked word priming

Electrophysiological correlates of masked orthographic and phonological priming in Chinese–English bilinguals

Mirror letter priming is rightward-biased but not inhibitory: Little evidence for a mirror suppression mechanism in the recognition of mirror letters.

Some neighbors are more interfering: Asymmetric priming by stroke neighbors in Chinese character recognition

An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory