Abstract:Purpose: Wearing ortho-k lenses overnight may not fully correct their daytime refractory errors of adolescents with moderate to high myopia. There are three common ways to deal with the daytime residual refractive error (RRE): 1) wearing spectacles to correct the RRE; 2) wear ortho-k lenses during the daytime instead of overnight.; 3) not correcting the residual refractive error. According to previous laboratory studies, myopic peripheral refraction is associated with better myopic control. This study had two aims:1) to compare relative peripheral refractive error (RPRE) among these ways after one-month stabilization; 2) to assess the axial length changes over 2 years of ortho-k lens overnight wear combined with spectacle glasses. Methods: This was a prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized, observational study in which a total of 27 subjects (20 females, 7 males, mean age 12.48 ± 2.23Y) with spherical equivalent refractive error from -5.00 to -8.25D were enrolled. All participants in the study wore orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses overnight for a minimum of one month. Subsequently, their peripheral refractive error (PRE) was assessed using an open-field autorefractor. During the assessment, the participants underwent three conditions in a random order in a same morning: 1) unaided eye after orthokeratology (referred to as the Unaided-eye condition), 2) wearing glasses to correct any remaining refractive errors after orthokeratology (referred to as the Spec-RE condition), and 3) wearing ortho-k lenses during the daytime (referred to as the Continuous OK wear condition). After testing, all subjects were instructed to wear ortho-k lenses overnight and glasses during the daytime to correct their RRE for the next 2 years, during which time the progression of their axial length was followed up. Results: 1) RPRE in either Unaided-eye or Spec-RE condition subjects were significantly more myopic than those in the Continuous OK wear condition. 2) No difference in RPRE was seen between Unaided-eye and Spec-RE conditions. 3) Axial length growth was 0.05 ± 0.20 mm and 0.17 ± 0.32 mm (mean ± standard deviation) at 1-year and 2-year follow-ups after the initial visit, respectively, which were comparable to mild myopia patients after orthokeratology. 4) After orthokeratology, axial length change had negative correlation with the initial age (p = 0.001, r = -0.616) and residual diopter (p = 0.022). Conclusions: For myopes above refraction < -5.00D, wearing Ortho-k lenses overnight and glasses to correct the RRE in the daytime is recommended to ensure good visual quality and have more myopic RPRE for potential myopia control.

Novel application of multispectral refraction topography in the observation of myopic control effect by orthokeratology lens in adolescents

Dynamic changes of ocular axial length in adolescent myopia

Application of orthokeratology on myopia control and its effect on ocular surface and meibomian gland function in Chinese myopic adolescents

Multi-Factor Analysis of the Influence of Orthokeratology on Controlling Myopia in Adolescents

Efficacy and safety of orthokeratology in adolescent myopia with different diopter

Retardation of Myopia by Multifocal Soft Contact Lens and Orthokeratology: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Overnight Orthokeratology for Correction and Control of Myopia in Adolescents

Influence of Baseline Myopic Refraction on Myopia Control in Youngsters Wearing Orthokeratology Lenses

Effect of Orthokeratology on Myopia Control in Adolescents

Orthokeratology and Low-Intensity Laser Therapy for Slowing the Progression of Myopia in Children

Orthokeratology lens and conventional frame glasses for ocular parameters of myopia adolescent

Interaction of retinal electrophysiology and novel orthokeratology lens use on myopia control efficacy in children

Comparison of the Effects of Orthokeratology and Highly Aspherical Lenselets in Achieving Myopia Control and Defocus in Adolescents

Effect of short-term orthokeratology lens or ordinary frame glasses wear on corneal thickness, corneal endothelial cells and vision correction in adolescents with low to moderate myopia

The Effect of Different Optical Designs for Orthokeratology in Controlling the Development of Myopia in Pre-Adolescents

Effects of Orthokeratology on 270 Myopia Adolescents

Different efficacy in myopia control: Comparison between orthokeratology and defocus-incorporated multiple segment lenses

Three optical intervention methods for low myopia control in children: a one-year follow-up study

The comparative study of orthokeratology lens and frame glasses in adolescent myopia

Orthokeratology combined with spectacles in moderate to high myopia adolescents

Factors Related to Myopia Progression in Orthokeratology Practice: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study