Author Response: A Multi-Scale Model for Hair Follicles Reveals Heterogeneous Domains Driving Rapid Spatiotemporal Hair Growth Patterning
Qixuan Wang,Ji Won Oh,Hye-Lim Lee,Anukriti Dhar,Tao Peng,Raúl Ramos,Christian F. Guerrero‐Juarez,Xiaojie Wang,Ran Zhao,Xiaoling Cao,Jonathan Le,Melisa A. Fuentes,Shelby C Jocoy,Antoni R Rossi,Brian Vu,Kim Pham,Xiaoyang Wang,Nanda Maya Mali,Jung Min Park,June-Hyug Choi,Hyunsu Lee,Julien Legrand,Eve Kandyba,Jung Chul Kim,Moonkyu Kim,John Foley,Zhengquan Yu,Krzysztof Kobielak,Bogi Andersen,Kiarash Khosrotehrani,Qing Nie,Maksim V. Plikus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.22772.094
2017-01-01
Abstract:Article Figures and data Abstract eLife digest Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Data availability References Decision letter Author response Article and author information Metrics Abstract The control principles behind robust cyclic regeneration of hair follicles (HFs) remain unclear. Using multi-scale modeling, we show that coupling inhibitors and activators with physical growth of HFs is sufficient to drive periodicity and excitability of hair regeneration. Model simulations and experimental data reveal that mouse skin behaves as a heterogeneous regenerative field, composed of anatomical domains where HFs have distinct cycling dynamics. Interactions between fast-cycling chin and ventral HFs and slow-cycling dorsal HFs produce bilaterally symmetric patterns. Ear skin behaves as a hyper-refractory domain with HFs in extended rest phase. Such hyper-refractivity relates to high levels of BMP ligands and WNT antagonists, in part expressed by ear-specific cartilage and muscle. Hair growth stops at the boundaries with hyper-refractory ears and anatomically discontinuous eyelids, generating wave-breaking effects. We posit that similar mechanisms for coupled regeneration with dominant activator, hyper-refractory, and wave-breaker regions can operate in other actively renewing organs. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22772.001 eLife digest Skin includes hundreds of thousands of hair follicles that cycle through different stages of activity. Each follicle grows hair, sometimes (in the case of long hairs like human head hair and horse tail hairs) for several years, before losing it. The follicle then goes through a resting stage before starting to grow another hair. To achieve high hair density, the follicles need to coordinate their hair-making activities. If they all worked independently from one another, bald patches would inevitably form that would compromise how effectively the skin works. Groups of cells can communicate using a variety of chemical signals. It was not known whether cells in hair follicles from different regions of the skin rely on the same signals to communicate, and whether follicles in neighboring regions are able to ‘understand’ one another. Through a combination of mathematical modeling and experimental results from mice, Wang, Oh et al. now show that hair follicles across the body use a common signaling system. This system consists of a pair of signals: ‘activators’ that stimulate hair growth, and ‘inhibitors’ that prevent it. The balance between these two signals affects the pattern of hair growth. For example, higher levels of activators allow fur to grow thickly on the belly of the mouse, likely to protect against heat loss and injuries from the ground. By contract, higher levels of inhibitors make the hairs on the ear sparse, which may prevent them from interfering with hearing. There is little evidence that hair follicles on the scalp communicate in adult humans. Learning to activate and control communication between these follicles could provide a way to treat male pattern baldness and similar conditions. Understanding how hair follicles communicate may also help researchers to develop ways of regenerating other fast-renewing organs, such as the gut and bone marrow. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22772.002 Introduction Featuring prominent growth cycles, the hair follicle (HF) is a model system of choice for studying tissue regeneration. At the level of cellular activities, the hair growth cycle consists of three consecutive phases: anagen, phase of active proliferation; catagen, apoptotic involution phase; and telogen, relative quiescence phase (Al-Nuaimi et al., 2010; Paus and Foitzik, 2004; Schneider et al., 2009; Stenn and Paus, 2001). Cyclic regeneration is sustained by the bulge stem cells, located at the base of the permanent HF portion (Cotsarelis et al., 1990). During anagen initiation, signals from the niche, including the dermal papilla (DP), stimulate bulge stem cells and adjacent hair germ (HG) progenitors to proliferate (Enshell-Seijffers et al., 2010; Greco et al., 2009; Legrand et al., 2016). Activated progenitors generate all lower HF structures, including the outer root sheath (ORS) and hair matrix. During catagen, a widespread apoptotic program remodels the HF back toward a telogen state (Botchkarev et al., 2001b; Fessing et al., 2006; Foitzik et al., 2000; Lindner et al., 1997; Mesa et al., 2015). Conceptually, since the bulge produces downward migrating progeny (Hsu et al., 2011), it effectively serves as a progenitor source, while the matrix functions as a sink, and the ORS as a channel for progenitors transiting between them. The signaling mechanisms that time these coordinated cellular activities during hair regeneration remain incompletely understood (Al-Nuaimi et al., 2014; Bernard, 2012; Lin et al., 2009; Paus et al., 1999). The putative ‘hair cycle clock’ is thought to be composed of one or several activator/inhibitor pairs acting to time key cycle phase transitions at set thresholds of their activities. Accordingly, cycle pace will depend on the speed at which activators and inhibitors reach their respective thresholds (Chen et al., 2015). Importantly, HFs exist as large populations and at least in the dorsal skin they interact to coordinate growth cycles (Hodgson et al., 2014; Plikus et al., 2011, Plikus and Chuong, 2008a, Plikus et al., 2008b). Such coordination implies that at least some of the activators and inhibitors should be present between HFs, in the so-called skin macro-environment. Previous work on dorsal skin indicates that BMP and WNT pathways constitute important components of the hair cycle clock. Indeed, defects in either of these pathways can dramatically change hair cycle progression (Botchkarev et al., 2001a; Botchkarev and Sharov, 2004; Choi et al., 2013; Enshell-Seijffers et al., 2010; Kandyba and Kobielak, 2014; Kandyba et al., 2013; Kobielak et al., 2003, 2007; Sharov et al., 2005, 2006), and ligands and antagonists for both pathways mediate macro-environmental coordination between HFs (Chen et al., 2014; Plikus et al., 2011; Plikus and Chuong, 2014). Additionally, FGF, PDGF, TGFβ, TNFα and other pathways can modulate hair cycle (Chen et al., 2015; Festa et al., 2011; Higgins et al., 2014; Ito et al., 2003; Kimura-Ueki et al., 2012; Leishman et al., 2013; Oshimori and Fuchs, 2012; Plikus, 2012; Rivera-Gonzalez et al., 2016). Importantly, the combined signaling activities for the above pathways partition the hair cycle in the dorsal skin into four functional phases, each with its distinct activator/inhibitor profile: propagating anagen (P), autonomous anagen (A), refractory telogen (R) and competent telogen (C) (Hodgson et al., 2014; Plikus and Chuong, 2014; Plikus et al., 2008b). Interactions between HFs enable hair regeneration across dorsal skin to self-organize into dynamic patterns. Critical for this self-organization are the following HF-to-HF interactions: P-phase HFs can induce neighboring C-phase HFs to enter anagen via diffusible activators, leading to hair growth coupling, while A-phase anagen or R-phase telogen HFs cannot couple due to high levels of inhibitors (Murray et al., 2012; Plikus et al., 2011; Plikus and Chuong, 2014; Plikus et al., 2008b). It remains unknown, however, whether this self-organization mechanism and its underlying WNT/BMP signaling activities is a general feature of all body skin or a special case for dorsal skin only. Integrative understanding of large-scale hair regeneration requires a systems biology approach. Previous modeling on HFs include cellular automaton models (Halloy et al., 2000; Plikus et al., 2011), feedback-control model (Al-Nuaimi et al., 2012) and the FitzHugh-Nagumo (FHN) excitable medium model (Murray et al., 2012). Here, we present a unified three-dimensional and stochastic modeling framework for the HF that captures: (i) activator/inhibitor signaling dynamics in a single HF, (ii) cyclic growth of a single HF, and (iii) coupling between multiple HFs through diffusive signals. Using this model, we reveal that skin as a whole behaves as a heterogeneous regenerative field, where: (a) dominant hair cycle waves start in the ventrum, (b) propagate dorsally in a bilateral pattern, (c) stop at the boundary with hyper-refractory ear skin, and (d) break at non-propagating anatomical landmarks, such as eyelids and ears. We also show that WNT and BMP serve as a universal activator/inhibitor signaling pair, whose varying activities underlie distinct hair regeneration dynamics in all anatomical locations studied. These results provide new understanding of how the entire skin of the animal manages all of its hair regeneration. Results A multi-scale model recapitulates a single growing HF, as well as HF-to-HF communication First, in modeling the geometry of a single HF, we considered four key expression sites for activator/inhibitor ligands, antagonists, and receptors along the HF axis: bulge, HG, matrix, and DP (Figure 1A). During the cycle, the bulge (assigned as Region I) remains relatively static, whereas the DP moves up and down along the HF axis. Also dynamic are the HG and matrix. The former only exists during telogen, while the latter only exists during anagen. The HG grows down to make matrix during anagen onset, whereas during catagen, the matrix collapses, and a new HG reforms. Simplistically, cyclic HG→matrix→HG dynamics are coordinated with the DP; thus, in the model we identify them jointly as Region II. Next, we considered that both regions produce signaling factors. Although a biological simplification, we assumed that Region I does so at a rather constant rate, while Region II shows distinct temporal dynamics (Appendix 2—table 4). We also assumed that Region II is essential for sending hair cycle-promoting signal(s), while Region I is the primary signal target. In short, we hypothesized that the essential temporal molecular dynamics in the HF operate as follows: Region II generates a signaling ligand (L) gradient; Region I detects it and transmits it into ligand-bound receptors (LR) that then, through a series of intermediate signaling steps not captured in the model directly (such as activities of the downstream signaling pathways and involvement of additional cell populations), regulates cyclic HF growth (Figure 1A). The molecular signaling events, either activating or inhibitory, can be summarized as: (1)∂∂t[L] = Diffusion+Production+Reaction of L and R(2)∂∂t[LR] = Reaction of L and R +Degradation +Extra Source Figure 1 Download asset Open asset Model recapitulates hair cycling and its associated activator and inhibitor signaling dynamics. (A) Schematic depiction of HF growth dynamics during telogen and anagen. Telogen and anagen HFs are shown on the left and in the center, respectively. In both hair cycle phases, Region I (purple) represents bulge and Region II (orange) represents DP with HG during telogen phase, and DP with matrix during anagen phase. On the right, schematic drawing of diffusive activator (Act. L. in green) and inhibitor (Inh. L. in red) interactions with their corresponding receptors (Act. R and Inh. R, not depicted) that form ligand-bond-receptors (Act. LR and Inh. LR) and their coupling with physical growth of the HF (blue) is shown. (B) Typical noise-free dynamics of the activator (green) and inhibitor (red) and cyclic HF growth (blue) are shown. X-axis is time in simulated days. Y-axis for activator and inhibitor shows simulated signaling levels, and for HF growth – simulated length of the HF. Grey area demarcates one modeled hair growth cycle. (C) The duration of ~anagen and ~telogen phases as the function of inhibitor signaling strengths. X-axis shows modeled inhibitor levels with ‘0’ being an arbitrary baseline levels. Y-axis shows time in simulated days. Upon stronger inhibitory signaling (high Inh. L level) ~anagen shortens (yellow) and ~telogen lengthens (purple). The entire cycle (blue) becomes longer either with stronger or weaker inhibitory signaling. When inhibitory signaling becomes either very strong or very weak, the excitability of the system breaks down and HFs equilibrate in one state (grey regions). Also see Appendix 2—tables 1, 2 and 4. (D–E’’) A total of 236 putative activator genes (green) and 122 putative inhibitor genes (red) available from a whole skin microarray dataset were identified to recapitulate temporal dynamics of the simulated activator (D) and inhibitor (E), respectively. Multiple WNT pathway members are in the putative activator gene set (D’, D’’), while BMP pathway members are among the putative inhibitor genes (E’, E’’). See gene list in Dataset 1. For all genes log-transformed, zero-mean expression profile values were calculated using colorimetric ratio-scale algorithm as reported in (Lin et al., 2009). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22772.003 where L, R and LR stand for ligands, receptors, and ligand-bound receptors, respectively. In the dynamics of LR (Equation 2), the ‘Extra Source’ describes stochastic signaling effects due to noise, and potential signaling contributions from Region I (Appendix 2-Governing equations for activators and inhibitors). As Equations 1 and 2 show, ligand-receptor interactions in the model take place only for the same signaling pathway, and no direct pathway cross-talk is set to occur. This, again, is a biological simplification. Recently, evidence for pathway interactions have emerged (Kandyba et al., 2013), and its effect is explored in Appendix 2-Possible interactions between the activator and inhibitor pathways do not qualitatively alter the HF dynamics. Our model integrates key signaling features of the hair growth cycle: strong activator signals enhance HF growth, while strong inhibitor signals prevent it. We modeled HF growth through the spatial average of LR concentration differences between the levels of activator and inhibitor in Region I (Equation 7 in Appendix 2-Modeling HF phases by concentration difference). We assumed the hair cycle has two critical ‘checkpoints’: (i) the event in late competent telogen, when production of activator starts to increase (Chen et al., 2014; Greco et al., 2009; Oshimori and Fuchs, 2012; Plikus et al., 2008b), and (ii) the event of anagen termination, when the HF starts to involute. Thus, our model recognizes two phases determined by these checkpoints: ~anagen, starting from the moment of activator amplification until anagen termination, and ~telogen, lasting until the next activator amplification event. In the context of the conventional hair growth cycle, ~anagen incorporates the late portion of competent telogen and the entire anagen, while ~telogen includes catagen, refractory telogen and the remainder of competent telogen (Plikus et al., 2011; Plikus and Chuong, 2014; Plikus et al., 2008b) (Appendix 2-Modeling HF phases by concentration difference; Appendix 2—figure 2). Model simulations produce several emergent behaviors. The cycle becomes autonomous – that is, it displays stable periodicity and excitability emerges naturally without a built-in ‘clock’ (Figure 1B). Cycling is maintained within a range of parameter values, allowing testing for various intrinsic and extrinsic signaling scenarios (Figure 1C). Associated with these dynamics are periodic changes in the system’s geometry – the signaling source in Region II moves cyclically. Simulations indicate that the moving HF geometry in the model is critical, greatly contributing to the regulation of the cycle. In a single HF model, activator/inhibitor diffusion occurs only along the HF axis. When a HF population is modeled, hair-to-hair communication emerges naturally as ligand diffusion from neighbors supplements intrinsic HF ligand levels. As such, hair cycle pace depends on interactive signaling between neighboring HFs – a feature that we explore below. HF cycling emerges from the growth-mediated coupling of activator and inhibitor Our model predicts that HF cycling occurs only within a certain range of signal strengths, that is the excitable regime (Figure 1C, white region). Within this regime, activator and inhibitor are predicted to inversely modulate duration of both ~telogen and ~anagen phases. At certain, either too high or too low signal strengths, the excitability is predicted to break down and the HF is expected to enter a non-cycling state of equilibrium (Figure 1C, grey regions). For example, when inhibitor levels are very high, the HF is predicted to equilibrate in an extended telogen (Appendix 2—figure 5A), while extended anagen is predicted for the opposite signaling condition (Appendix 2—figure 5B). Next, we used bioinformatic and experimental approaches to validate the model’s key prediction that the same activator or inhibitor pathway can inversely modulate telogen and anagen phase duration. Considering the established roles for BMP and WNT as respective inhibitor and activator pathways regulating telogen duration in the dorsal skin, we explored if they can also regulate anagen duration in the same skin region in a model-predicted fashion. First, we found that model-predicted temporal dynamics for inhibitor and activator during ~anagen (Figure 1D and 1E) match the actual anagen expression dynamics for multiple BMP and WNT pathway members established on a highly temporally resolved whole-tissue dorsal skin microarray dataset (Lin et al., 2009) (Figure 1D–E’’; Appendix 1-Identifying model predicted hair cycle activators and inhibitors). We also show that perturbing BMP (for details see Appendix 1-Validating model-predicted roles for BMP signaling in hair cycle control) and WNT in transgenic mice (for details see Appendix 1-Validating model-predicted roles for WNT signaling in hair cycle control) alters dorsal anagen phase duration and leads to hair length defects in a way that is consistent with the model’s predictions. Overall, this data shows that our model generates biologically meaningful outcomes and that its predictive power is robust. Model reveals skin is a heterogeneous regenerative field Next, we set out to explore novel aspects of hair regeneration at the population level. For this purpose, we modeled a linear array of HFs (i.e. two-dimensional organization; Appendix 2—figure 4A) and a grid of HFs (i.e. three-dimensional organization; Appendix 2—figure 4B). In both cases, the diffusion of activators and inhibitors accompanying each HF during growth naturally led to HF coupling (Appendix 1-Validating model-predicted roles for BMP signaling in hair cycle control) and emergence of several known features of collective hair growth behavior, including spontaneous anagen initiation and anagen wave spreading (Appendix 2—figures 11, 12). We then focused on the phenomenon of bilaterally symmetric hair growth that is prominent in young mice (Plikus et al., 2008b) yet remains unexplained. Conventionally, first anagen in the dorsal skin of newborn mice is considered synchronous. On the other hand, adult mice display fully asynchronous and asymmetric dorsal hair growth patterns (Chen et al., 2014; Plikus and Chuong, 2008a; Plikus et al., 2009). This, however, is preceded by prominent bilateral symmetry, which often persists into the fourth hair cycle (Plikus and Chuong, 2008a). We now show that in the three-dimensional model where all HFs are assumed to be identical, full asynchrony evolves within just one cycle, and bilateral symmetry cannot be achieved (Appendix 2-Dorsal and ventral HF patterns; Appendix 2—figures 11, 12; Appendix 2—video 1). Therefore, we hypothesized that first anagen is inherently asynchronous as a result of spatially patterned HF development. Indeed, spatial distribution of early anagen HFs in the dorsal skin of newborn mice (Figure 2A–D) reveals head-to-tail and subtle lateral-to-medial asynchronies. We modeled the impact of these asynchronies on hair growth pattern evolution. Simulations reproduced head-to-tail asynchrony (Appendix 2-Dorsal and ventral HF patterns; Appendix 2—figures 14, 15; Appendix 2—video 3); however, it persisted for at least 10 cycles, which is far more than the 3–4 cycles observable in mice. Moreover, prominent bilateral symmetry failed to form. Figure 2 Download asset Open asset Spatiotemporal patterning of early hair cycles. (A–D) Analysis of the whole mount dorsal skin samples from P0 (n = 3) (A) and P1 WT mice (n = 3) (A’) reveals subtle head-to-tail and lateral-to-medial hair cycle asynchronies. Asynchronies were inferred from examining the size of pigmented HFs. Larger HFs result from earlier anagen onset. (B) Heatmaps of skin samples from A and A’ built based on black pixel density (reflecting pigmented anagen HFs). (C) Quantification of anagen HFs at different phases confirms head-to-tail pattern asynchrony. Morphological definition of anagen phases used for this analysis is provided at the bottom on the panel. (D) Analysis of the whole mount dorsal skin samples from P0 220bpMsx2-hsplacZ mice, where lacZ reporter activates in anagen HFs starting from phase IIIb, confirms head-to-tail asynchrony. (E, F) Modeling rapid hair growth pattern evolution in the context of two heterogeneous domains. (E) Schematic depiction of the modeling conditions with central Dorsal domain flanked by two lateral Ventral sub-domains with coupling between Dorsal and Ventral HFs. (F) Compared to Dorsal domain HFs, Ventral domain HFs were assigned with higher levels of total available activator and inhibitor receptors, allowing shorter ~anagen and ~telogen duration. Furthermore, hair cycle asynchrony was introduced into Dorsal domain to model the initial head-to-tail asynchrony. In simulations, interactions between HFs across domain boundaries result in bilateral symmetry during the second cycle (simulated time t68-78.5). Also, initial asynchrony breaks down in the cycle 3 (t130), and partial bilateral symmetry maintains into the late cycles (see Appendix 2—video 4). Scale bars: A, A’, D – 5 mm. Images on A, A’ and D are composites. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22772.004 We note that the above and previous simulations (Murray et al., 2012; Plikus et al., 2011) were performed on homogenous HF populations, where all HFs are assumed to be identical. We then considered that novel patterns might develop upon interaction of two or more HF populations, whose activator/inhibitor signaling levels are inherently different. In principle, dorsal skin HFs can interact with HFs from other body regions, such as ventral skin, where hair cycle dynamics are potentially distinct. Because all skin is continuous and forms an approximation of a cylinder, we modeled it as an unrolled sheet, where two Ventral sub-domains flank a rectangular Dorsal domain (Figure 2E). For initial modeling conditions (Appendix 2-Dorsal and ventral HF patterns), we considered that: (i) the first cycle on the dorsal skin has built-in head-to-tail asynchrony, and that (ii) ventral HFs develop with a 3- to 4-day delay relative to dorsal HFs (Appendix 1—figures 7–9). Because ventral HFs are known to produce distinctly shorter hairs (Candille et al., 2004), in the model we assumed that they have faster cycle dynamics compared to dorsal HFs (Appendix 2-Changes in the total amount of activator and inhibitor receptors results in different sensitivity of ~anagen and ~telogen lengths to signaling changes, Appendix 2-Dorsal and ventral HF patterns; Appendix 2—figures 8, 9). Indeed, in this configuration, our model readily reproduced patterns with aspects of bilateral symmetry already in the second cycle as the result of dominant waves spreading from the Ventral to the Dorsal domain (Figure 2F, t68-78.5). Importantly, after the second cycle, the effect of the initial built-in head-to-tail asynchrony started to disappear. Instead, the interaction between Ventral and Dorsal HFs continued to produce prominent bilateral symmetry in the third (Figures 2F, t130-145) and later cycles (Appendix 2—video 4). Taken together, the model predicts that rapid hair growth pattern evolution requires interaction of two or more skin domains with distinct hair cycle parameters. Ventral-dorsal interactions produce bilaterally symmetric hair growth patterns Next, we imaged Flash mice, whose luciferase reporter produces skin-specific WNT activity signal and allows to sensitively and non-invasively determine the location and percentage of anagen HFs across the entire body (Hodgson et al., 2014) (Figure 3A–C). Luminescence levels were measured both dorsally and ventrally and mice were followed up until day P119, encompassing up to five hair growth cycles. Combined analysis from multiple mice reveals prominent phase advancement in ventral over dorsal anagen, specifically during the second, third, and fourth hair cycles (Figure 3B, blue area). Additionally, the spatial luminescence signal mapping reveals distinct ventral-to-dorsal anagen propagation with features of bilateral symmetry during second (Figure 3C; Appendix 1—figure 6) and third cycles (Figure 3C’), supporting the patterning mechanism predicted by the model (Figure 2F). We also mapped body-wide hair growth patterns on the basis of anagen HF pigmentation between days P0-P55 (Figure 3D–G; Appendix 1—figures 7–12). This analysis confirms ventral over dorsal anagen phase advancement starting from the second cycle and provides the following additional insights: Figure 3 Download asset Open asset Dorsal-ventral HF interactions produce bilateral symmetry. (A) Time-lapse bioluminescence in dorsal and ventral skin of the representative Flash mouse between days P5-P48. Bioluminescent signal is color-coded according to the colorimetric scale on the right. (B) Combined temporal dynamics (from 6 Flash mice) of the bioluminescent signal-based anagen measurements over four hair cycles (days P5-P119). Dorsal skin dynamics are in brown and ventral skin dynamics are in blue. Prominent temporal advancement of ventral over dorsal anagen initiation can be seen during second, third and fourth cycles (light blue areas). This advancement is accompanied by dominant ventral-to-dorsal anagen wave spreading. (C, C’) Mapping of Flash-based anagen reveals ventral-to-dorsal hair growth wave propagation and bilateral pattern symmetry. New anagen areas for each time point are color-coded. Second anagen initiation is shown on panel C, and third anagen initiation on panel C’. Also see Appendix 1—figure 6. (D–G) Hair growth distribution patterns on P17 (D), P21 (E), P39 (F) and P55 (G). Three mice were analyzed at each time point. Inverted whole mount skin samples from representative mice are shown. Schematic pattern maps are provided with color-coded anagen (green), catagen (yellow) and telogen (red) regions. Also see Appendix 1—figures 7–12. (H, I) HF cycling dynamics in chin skin grafts remain faster compared to dorsal skin grafts. After transplantation, first anagen initiated similarly in both chin and dorsal skin grafts, however, second anagen initiated significantly faster in chin grafts. Representative chin and dorsal skin grafts are shown on (H). Combined temporal dynamics of skin grafts in anagen and telogen are shown on (I). Dorsal graft dynamics are in brown and chin graft dynamics are in blue. Temporal advancement of chin over dorsal second anagen initiation is highlighted with light blue color. Also see Appendix 1—figure 13. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22772.005 (i) Ventrally, anagen phase is the shortest in the ‘chin domain’, ending around P10. It is longer in the ‘ventral domain’ proper, ending in the genital area around P14 and in the chest area around P17 (Figure 3D). (ii) Dorsally, anagen is the shortest in the ‘cranial domain’, ending around P14. In the ‘dorsal domain’ proper it ends as a head-to-tail wave between P15-P20 (Figure 3D; Appendix 1—figures 10, 11). (iii) First ventral telogen is shorter than dorsal telogen. Second anagen initiates in the chin and ventral domains already between P21-24 and then spreads toward ventral-dorsal boundaries in form of two bilaterally symmetric waves (Figure 3E; Appendix 1—figure 12). Second anagen also ends faster in the ventral skin, maintaining ventral-dorsal asynchrony and bilateral symmetry (Figure 3F). (iv) Third anagen initiates the fastest in the chin domain, as early as P42 (Figures 3G and 4H). When transplanted onto the back of pigmented SCID mice, chin skin grafts (n = 8) showed faster cycling compared to dorsal skin grafts (n = 8). While first post-transplantation anagen started with similar timing in both chin and dorsal grafts, consecutive anagen started significantly faster in chin grafts (Figure 3H and I; Appendix 1—figure 13). Furthermore, in many instances, grafts induced anagen in the surrounding dorsal host skin. Taken together, these data support that dominant ventral-to-dorsal hair wave spreading drives rapid hair growth pattern evolution and bilateral symmetry. Underlying this behavior are faster hair growth cycle dynamics in chin and ventral HFs, a property that is partially maintained upon skin grafting. Next, we asked if faster hair cycle dynamics in chin and ventral domains correlate with distinct molecular dynamics in putative activators and inhibitors. We performed RNA-seq profiling of whole skin from chin, ventral and dorsal domains at six hair cycle time points: first (aka competent) telogen, early anagen, mid-anagen, late anagen, catagen and early second (aka refractory) telogen. Analysis revealed non-overlapping transcriptomic trajectories of the hair cycle between the three domains (Figure 4A–B’’) and domain-specific expression patterns for multiple putative ac