Bioequivalence evaluation of menthol after oral administration of peppermint oil soft capsules in dogs

Jing-Fang Wu,Bing-Ren Xiang,Kui-Xing Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1296315
2011-12-03
Arzneimittelforschung
Abstract:A randomized, two-way, crossover, bioequivalence study in 6 beagle dogs was conducted to compare the bioavailability of two peppermint oil formulations, soft capsule and hard capsule. The drug was given in a single dose of two capsules (total, 200 mg), and blood samples were withdrawn during the 12 h after drug administration. Menthol (CAS 2216-51-5) as the main component of peppermint oil was determined by a gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/I MS) method after cleavage with beta-glucuronidase. The following pharmacokinetic variables were computed for the two formulations: maximum concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), half-life of elimination (t1/2), mean residence time (MRT), and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity)). For calculation of the 90% confidence interval (CI), an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out. The results indicated that treatment and subject had statistically significant effect on AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax, and the 90% CIs for AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax were outside the acceptable bioequivalence range. The relative bioavailability was 121.4 +/- 10.6% for AUC(0-infinity). Therefore, it can be concluded that the two formulations are not bioequivalent and the bioavailability of soft capsules is significantly higher than that of hard capsules.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?