Spinal Cord Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Single-Center Case Series
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s462587
IF: 2.8319
2024-06-11
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Pawe&lstrok Sokal, 1 Damian Palus, 1 Magdalena Jab&lstroko&nacuteska, 2 Oskar Puk, 2 Sara Kieronska-Siwak 1 1 Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, 85-168, Poland; 2 Doctoral School Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, 85-168, Poland Correspondence: Pawe&lstrok Sokal, Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Ujejskiego 75, Bydgoszcz, 85-168, Poland, Email Purpose: Central neuropathic pain (CNP) following spinal cord injury (SCI) presents a formidable therapeutic challenge, affecting over 50% of the patients post-SCI. For those who experience CNP, conventional treatments often prove insufficient. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) emerges as a potential intervention for chronic pain after SCI that is unresponsive to pharmacotherapy and supportive measures. However, the efficacy of SCS in alleviating CNP is notably limited. The objective of our study was to evaluate novel stimulation paradigms in SCS for patients with severe CNP after SCI, based on our extensive experience. Patients and Methods: From a pool of 112 patients treated with SCS for chronic neuropathic pain in the Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, we selected eight individuals (4 males and 4 females) with CNP for our case series. Burst and high frequency SCS was applied. The assessment involved utilizing the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), and the EQ-5D quality of life scale before surgery and during a 12-month follow-up period. Results: Over the course of the one-year follow-up, only two patients experienced satisfactory relief from pain, demonstrating the effectiveness of the stimulation. Moreover, high-frequency and burst SCS failed to show improvement in the remaining six patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, despite the incorporation of new stimulation paradigms such as burst stimulation and high-frequency stimulation, SCS does not exhibit significant effectiveness in treating neuropathic pain in patients after SCI. These findings highlight the ongoing challenge of treating CNP and emphasize the importance of investigating alternative therapeutic strategies for this group. Keywords: spinal cord stimulation, central neuropathic pain, spinal cord injury, burst stimulation, high-frequency stimulation Central neuropathic pain (CNP) following spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most challenging types of pain to manage. Approximately more than half of patients after SCI endure chronic neuropathic pain. 1–3 Severe chronic pain significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Furthermore, chronic pain after SCI is often unresponsive to conventional treatments and proves challenging to manage. 3,4 Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can be applied in cases of chronic pain after SCI that is refractory to pharmacotherapy and supportive treatments. However, the effectiveness of SCS in alleviating pain after SCI is limited. There is a scarcity of studies and a lack of clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of SCS in SCI pain. 5 Since the initial use of SCS for post-SCI pain treatment, there have been no randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of this intervention. 6 A recent systematic review by Dombovy-Johnson et al included 69 patients treated with SCS for chronic neuropathic pain after SCI, categorizing the evidence as low quality based on GRADE criteria 7 . No case series of patients with CNP after SCI was treated with high frequency or burst SCS were reported. The objective of our study was to describe the effectiveness of novel stimulation paradigms in SCS for patients with severe CNP after SCI, based on our extensive experience. From a pool of 112 patients treated with SCS for chronic neuropathic pain, mostly related to persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), we selected eight individuals (4 males and 4 females) with CNP caused by SCI for our case series. Burst and high frequency SCS was applied (Figure 1). In six patients, the pain's pathophysiology was associated with traumatic SCI, while in the remaining two, it resulted from stroke. Level of SCI in four patients was located in the cervical spinal cord, in the other three in the thoracic spinal cord, and in the other two in the spinal conus medullaris. Table 1 presents characteristics of patients. Table 1 Patients' Characteristics Figure 1 Number of patients with chronic neuropathic pain treated in the Department of Neurosurgery and Neurolo -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology