Abstract:Across both the developing and developed worlds, community engagement has become a key strategy for natural resource management. However, a growing number of studies report that community-based approaches are experiencing formidable challenges, with limited outcomes in terms of livelihoods, decentralization and sustainability. Yet, policies continue to focus attention unduly on “community participation”, ignoring the ways in which the “community” is itself embedded in a wider social system. Recent studies have shown that local communities are more complex than previously assumed, with local community actions being heavily shaped by wider social and environmental contexts. Yet, scholarly research tends to focus on reporting such cross-scalar dynamics, with little explanation of how and why they occur. This paper advances a framework to understand how local communities interact with the wider world, through what we term “delocalization of communities” in natural resource management. Using Bourdieu’s theory of social field, we present an approach to analyze various trajectories of delocalization involving the exchange of, and struggle for, a variety of resources valued in specific fields of natural resource governance.We extend the work of several researchers who have been critical of the conventional view of the community, and argue that a new model of delocalized “community” needs to be envisaged, one that emphasizes the interactions among actors within and between spatial scales and levels of political organization. While such a cross-scalar view is not novel, we deepen social field approach to assess how cross-scalar processes unfold in the course of “delocalization” of communities in the context of rapid social and environmental change. We draw on evidence from five different case studies from three continents that demonstrate specific aspects of the delocalization phenomenon.The cases selected are from Australia, Indonesia, Mexico, Nepal, and Papua New Guinea. We demonstrate through these cases that increasingly diverse interests in natural resources such as forests have served to delocalize communities beyond “local” domains. We conclude that local community is not a localized entity, and there are multiple cross-scale networks which need to be recognized, as these have profound implications in community-based natural resource management. In such situations, open and exploratory approaches - moving away from blueprint interventions - are required to facilitate context-specific fields and spheres of local democracy, nurturing diverse, flexible, and networked models of community participation, along with the recognition of political and economic influence coming from the wider domain.

Facilitating multi-sector dialogue for natural resource management: Examples of rural governance in two Queensland regions

Regional agricultural governance in peri-urban and rural South Australia: strategies to improve multifunctionality

Integrated social-ecological data for regional natural resource management

Developing a regional governance index: The institutional potential of rural regions

Transforming cross-cultural water research through trust, participation and place

Understanding the Social Licence of Carbon Farming in the Australian Rangelands

An agent-based approach to explore the effect of voluntary mechanisms on land use change: a case in rural Queensland, Australia

Toward land restoration transitions: elevating regional voices and the provenance of co-benefits in Queensland rangelands

The Integral Role of Organisational Governance in Promoting Interprofessional Education in Rural Settings

Managing biodiversity on private land: Directions for collaboration through reconciliation ecology

Farmers as modern-day stewards and the rise of new rural citizenship in the battle over land use

Rural Regional Governance in the United States: The Case of the Resource Conservation and Development Program*

Connecting Nature: The Potential of Australian Dairy Initiatives in Collaborative Biodiversity Governance

New Forms of Sub-regional Governance and Implications for Rural Areas: Evidence from England

Financialising governance? State actor engagement with private finance for rural development in the Northern Territory of Australia

Feasibility of a novel participatory multi-sector continuous improvement approach to enhance food security in remote Indigenous Australian communities

Delocalizing Communities: Changing Forms of Community Engagement in Natural Resources Governance

Institutional rearrangements in the north Luangwa ecosystem: Implications of a shift to community based natural resource management for equity in protected area governance

New community governance in small rural towns: the Australian experience

Restructuring of Rural Governance in a Rapidly Growing Resource Town: The Case of Kitimat, BC, Canada

Making the Case for Place Based Governance in Rural Health Workforce Recruitment and Retention: Lessons From Canada and Australia