Neophallus Construction and Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Techniques and Complications

Alice B. Walton,Megan Lerner,Wayne J. G. Hellstrom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-021-00316-5
2021-10-24
Current Sexual Health Reports
Abstract:Purpose of ReviewNeophallus construction (NPC) and penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) techniques are critical components of masculinizing genital gender affirming surgery (gGAS). We aim to summarize the recent techniques and complications from the literature on NPC and PPI over the last 3 years.Recent FindingsPhalloplasty techniques include suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty, musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF), single stage radial forearm free flap (RFFF), groin flap phalloplasty, and anterolateral thigh flap (ALT). Various implants and implantation techniques are described, two of which are novel devices designed specifically for transgender surgery: ZSI 100 FtM Malleable penile implant and ZSI 475 FtM implant (Zephyr Surgical Implants, Geneva, Switzerland). NPR and PPI are associated with higher complication rates compared to routine prosthetic surgery. Urethral fistulas remain the most prevalent complication; however, recent technical advancements and the exclusion of urethral lengthening procedures have reduced the rates of fistula formation.SummaryThere are exciting PPI technology innovations in transgender-specific care, but, at this juncture, the lack of comparison studies makes it difficult to access outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?