Abstract:Introduction In the realm of corporate social responsibility (CSR), legacy brands face very real challenges in effectively aligning their initiatives with contemporary societal expectations. These venerable brands are often entrenched in traditional CSR models, and some have encountered notable difficulties in identifying and implementing outlets for their CSR endeavors that resonate authentically with modern consumer sensibilities. The negative publicity that followed failed campaigns such as Starbucks' "Race Together" campaign in 2015 or Pepsi's "Live For Now" ad with Kendall Jenner in 2017far outweighs any consumer goodwill, particularly for consumers who identify with the brand (Einwiller, Lis, Ruppel, & Sen, 2019). Similarly, after posting about donations made to the Black Lives Matter movement and other civil rights organizations, the CEO of the sustainable fashion brand Reformation resigned when accusations of racism within the organization came to light in the comments sections of those same posts (Ho, 2020). On the other hand, brands such as Ben and Jerry's and REI have CSR efforts that are received well by consumers, due to their long-time commitment to activism and environmentalism, respectively. Consumers increasingly demand that brands and organizations take stances on the social issues they care about (Cone Communications, 2015), but how can legacy brands get involved in a social cause with which they have no previous history? CSR, one way for brands to engage with social causes, is defined as the "management of stakeholder concern for responsible and irresponsible acts related to environmental, ethical and social phenomena in a way that creates corporate benefit" (Vaaland, Heide, & Grønhaug, 2008, p. 931), but it can also be generally understood as any activity where a firm goes beyond compliance and contributes to the greater social good (McWilliams & Siegel, 2001). CSR is increasingly important to contemporary consumers, thus more and more brands are engaging in it; however, the more brands engage in it, the more savvy and skeptical consumers become of CSR in general. Correspondingly, prominent brands have been accused of woke-washing, or "appropriating the language of social activism into marketing materials" without substantial action taken to address those issues (Dowell & Jackson, 2020). To avoid woke-washing and show commitment to change, companies need to prioritize holding themselves accountable, commit to structural change, and address hierarchical power dynamics between the organization and employees (see Dowell & Jackson, 2020 for a detailed explanation of these points). Brands can choose to focus their CSR efforts internally on the organization or externally on a cause outside of the organization. Perceived authenticity—how genuine or organic the initiatives appear to consumers—is crucial to the success of these efforts (Pérez, 2019). Furthermore, since CSR messages are often disseminated on social media, authenticity is also necessary to cut through the clutter of meaningless commercialization on social media platforms (Campagna, Donthu, & Yoo, 2021). Using extant theorizing on brand authenticity (Pérez, 2019) and research on congruency (Sung, Lim, & Lee, 2022) to inform our reasoning, we investigate how consumers in the United States process and evaluate messages promoting internal and external CSR, and we probe brand authenticity as the causal mechanism underlying message effectiveness. This research contributes to the literature on brand authenticity and congruency by investigating how these factors facilitate the relationship between CSR strategies and consumer outcomes. Furthermore, based on theorizing suggesting that congruency and relative social impact are key antecedents to authenticity (Pérez, 2019), we probe brand age and size as boundary conditions of this effect. In considering authenticity as a mechanism, we explain why it is essential to consider CSR type and brand extrinsic cues in tandem to understand consumers' reactions to CSR messages on social media. The aim of this study is to further understanding of CSR initiatives for legacy and novel brands that are perceived as meaningful and genuine. Specifically, proposing that there may not be a one-size-fits-all solution and that extrinsic brand cues play a role in how these messages are received, we focus on comparing consumer responses to advertising campaigns that emphasize external CSR (e.g., donating to charity) and internal CSR (e.g., funding initiatives within the organization) and their interaction with extrinsic brand cues that affect willingness to purchase from those brands in the future. The rest of the paper proceeds as follows. First, we review the literature on CSR in general, followed by internal versus external CSR and -Abstract Truncated-

Adapting the PZB service quality model to reputation risk analysis and the implications for CSR communication

Pride or empathy? Exploring effective CSR communication strategies on social media

Company’s Reputation as an Intangible Asset and the Risks to It from Perceiving Socially Responsible Practices as “Hypocritical”

Teaching reputational risk management in the supply chain

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its Influence on Organizational Reputation

Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions

The Formation of Reputation in CSR Disclosure: the Role of Signal Transmission and Sensemaking Processes of Stakeholders

Does Being Socially Responsible Buffer Reputation Loss in a Product Crisis? the Moderating Role of Lay Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility

THE ROLE OF CSR COMMUNICATION IN STRENGTHENING CORPORATE REPUTATION

Doing bad by doing good? Corporate social responsibility fails when controversy arises

CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing

Corporate Reputation Through Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights From Service Industry Companies

Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective

Can corporate social responsibility deter consumer dysfunctional behavior?

Corporate reputation through strategic communication of corporate social responsibility

The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions in Brand Equity, Brand Credibility, Brand Reputation, and Purchase Intentions

Perceptions and perspectives: corporate social responsibility and the media

Linking CSR Communication to Corporate Reputation: Understanding Hypocrisy, Employees Social Media Engagement and CSR-Related Work Engagement

The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility in shaping corporate reputation: An analysis of competitive action and innovation strategies

Using the right CSR communication strategy:The impact on consumer attitude and behavior

Internal versus External Corporate Social Responsibility: Company Age and Size Moderate CSR Efficacy