Abstract:In the early 1970s, we and others in the economics profession became enamored with the notion of externalties—a cost or benefit imposed on or provided to others but not taken into account by the economic agents who generate the effect. We, and others, seemed to see external effects everywhere. There was polluted water and air, noise, urban blight, traffic congestion, and other features of modern life that seemed to call out for some form of corrective action. As the externalities revolution unfolded, economists and other social scientists overlooked the importance of evolved legal and other institutions that formally and informally establish property and liability rules that cause decision makers to face the cost of their actions, including what otherwise could be external costs imposed on unwilling third parties. While markets seemed always to fail, political institutions were seen systematically as without blemish, or so it seemed. It was this two-pronged failure, 1) a failure to consider and state assumptions about background institutional arrangements and 2) a disregard for special interest politics, that became the Achilles Heel of the otherwise elegant externality arguments. Eventually, it was the modern institutionalists, scholars who focused on laws, regulation, and rules of the marketplace, who attempted to close the lid and drive the nails on the externality coffin. In this paper, we reach back to 1920 and trace the rise and decline of the policy importance of externalities theory. Beginning with A. C. Pigou and Alfred Marshall, our story includes some of the great figures in economic history of thought. But while theory was being built, institutions were overlooked. Pigou continues to be a dominant player in the story until the 1960s and 1970s when externalities theory was challenged by James M. Buchanan, Ronald Coase and other scholars. It is here in the twilight years of the externalities revolution that the prospects of government failure are raised as being more daunting than the likelihood of market failure. Finally, in the late 1970s and beyond, the externalities revolution is replaced by a property rights revolution.

Internalization of External Costs During the Crisis of Environmental Policy or as a Crisis for Economic Policy

Beyond Economics and Econometrics: Some Psychological and Political Aspects of the Internalization of External Costs

THE END OF THE EXTERNALITY REVOLUTION

A solution for external costs beyond negotiation and taxation

The economics of immense risk, urgent action and radical change: towards new approaches to the economics of climate change

Karl Polanyi's and K. William Kapp's arguments on social costs: is there a common "revolutionary" raison d'être ?

Externalities, scarcity, and abundance

Internalization of the social cost of carbon in each of the countries of the world—An economic assessment of its impacts

Internal devaluation: A controversial effort for adjustment within the Euro area

Post-environmentalism: an internal critique

The Ecological Rationality of Historical Costs and Conservatism

Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Diplomacy: The time has come for a Corporate and Financial Social Justice Great Reset

Policy Shortfalls and the World Economic Crisis

"Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity" in the Era of Polycrisis: Institutionalist Economics beyond the t/T Duality

Positive Externalities and R&D: Two Conflicting Traditions in Economic Theory

Optimal policies in a small open economy with an environmental externality and shallow foreign exchange markets

Escaping Damocles' Sword: Endogenous Climate Shocks in a Growing Economy

Environmental Risk: A Comparative Law and Economics Approach to Liability and Insurance

The Public Economics of Climate Change

Complexity, economic science and possible economic benefits of climate change mitigation policy

The Cost of Environmental Policy Under Induced Technical Change