Abstract:Despite increasing acknowledgement that social capital is an important determinant of health and overall well-being, empirical evidence regarding the direction and strength of these linkages in the developing world is limited and inconclusive. This paper empirically examines relationships between social capital and health and well-being-as well as the suitability of commonly used social capital measures-in rural China, where rapid economic growth coexists with gradual and fundamental social changes. To measure social capital, we adopt a structural/cognitive distinction, whereby structural social capital is measured by organizational membership and cognitive social capital is measured by a composite index of trust, reciprocity, and mutual help. Our outcome measures included self-reported general health, psychological health, and subjective well-being. We adopt multi-level estimation methods to account for our conceptualization of social capital as both an individual- and contextual-level resource. Results indicate that cognitive social capital (i.e., trust) is positively associated with all three outcome measures at the individual level and psychological health/subjective well-being at the village level as well. We further find that trust affects health and well-being through pathways of social network and support. In contrast, there is little statistical association or consistent pattern between structural social capital (organizational membership) and the outcome variables. Furthermore, although organizational membership is highly correlated with collective action, neither is associated with health or well-being. Our results suggest that policies aimed at producing an environment that enhances social networks and facilitates the exchange of social support hold promise for improving the health and well-being of the rural Chinese population. In addition, China may not have fully taken advantage of the potential contribution of structural social capital in advancing health and well-being. A redirection of collective action from economic to social activities may be worth considering.

Inclusive Finance Credit Behaviours and Income Inequality: Matter of Social Capital?

Social Capital, Financial Lending, and Household Income—An Empirical Study from China

Social Endowment Insurance and Inequality of the Household Portfolio Choice: The Moderating Effect of Financial Literacy

Social networks, inclusive finance, and residents' well-being: An empirical study based on CFPS

Social Network and Rural Credit in China;Evidence from CFPS

Does Social Capital Buffer or Exacerbate Mental Health Inequality? Evidence from the China Family Panel Study (CFPS)

A Theory of Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality

Social Networks and Informal Financial Inclusion in China

Finance And Inequality: Evidence From China

Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Household Formal Credit: Evidence from China Household Finance Survey

Inclusive finance and household education investment: an asset management perspective

Impact and Mechanism of Digital Inclusive Finance on the Urban–Rural Income Gap of China from a Spatial Econometric Perspective

Does financial inclusion help alleviate household poverty and vulnerability in China?

Impacts of formal credit on rural household income: Evidence from deprived areas in western China

Digital inclusive finance and asset allocation of Chinese residents: Evidence from the China Household Finance Survey.

Digital inclusion finance, social governance and household investment decisions

Inclusive or Fraudulent: Digital Inclusive Finance and Urban–Rural Income Gap

Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Consumption Inequality in China

Digital financial inclusion and household financial vulnerability: An empirical analysis of rural and urban disparities in China

Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China

Accessibility of financial services and household consumption in China: Evidence from micro data