Abstract:Background: Publicly funded healthcare forms an intricate part of government spending in most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, because of its reliance on entitlements and dedicated revenue streams. The impact of budgetary rules and procedures on publicly funded health care might thus be different from other spending categories. In this study we focus on the potential of fiscal rules to contain these costs and their design features. Methods: We assess the relationship between fiscal rules and the level of public health care expenditure of 32 (OECD) countries between 1985 and 2014. Our dataset consists of health care expenditure data of the OECD and data on fiscal rules of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for that same period. Through a multivariate regression analysis, we estimate the association between fiscal rules and its subcategories and inflation adjusted public health care expenditure. We control for population, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), debt and whether countries received an IMF bailout for the specific period. In all our regressions we include country and year fixed effects. Results: The presence of a fiscal rule on average is associated with a 3 % reduction of public health care expenditure. Supranational balanced budget rules are associated with some 8 % lower expenditure. Health service provision-oriented countries with more passive purchasing structures seem less capable of containing costs through fiscal rules. Fiscal rules demonstrate lagged effectiveness; the potential for expenditure reduction increases after one and two years of fiscal rule implementation. Finally, we find evidence that fiscal frameworks that incorporate multi-year expenditure ceilings show additional potential for cost control. Conclusions: Our study shows that there seems a clear relationship between the potential of fiscal rules and budgeting health expenses. Using fiscal rules to contain the level of health care expenditure can thus be a necessary precondition for successful strategies for cost control.

Public Debt Consolidation with Multi-Tier Governments: Rules Matter

Government debt: the impact of fiscal rules at the European and national level

Expansionary Fiscal Spending among Chinese Local Governments:Observations and Explanations

Fiscal Delegation in a Monetary Union: Instrument Assignment and Stabilization Properties

Stability and performance of monetary and fiscal policies in the euro euro area

Fiscal Rules and Market Discipline

The financial structure of government debt in OECD countries: An examination of the time-consistency issue

Government Solvency, Austerity and Fiscal Consolidation in the OECD: A Keynesian Appraisal of Transversality and No Ponzi Game Conditions

Fiscal rules, powerful levers for controlling the health budget? Evidence from 32 OECD countries

Fiscal Policy in Europe: Controversies over Rules, Mutual Insurance, and Centralization

Why do governments cut their deficits?

Do Citizens Care About Government Debt? Evidence from Survey Experiments on Budgetary Priorities

From china to the world: the implications of fiscal decentralization, government debt, and public health dynamics

The impact of fiscal rules on government debt: evidence from the CFA zone

The rise of common public debt in Europe: a new chapter in fiscal integration?

Are Central Government Rules Okay? Assessing the Hidden Costs of Centralised Discipline for Municipal Borrowing

Fiscal Rules versus the Financial Conditionof EU Local Government Units

Fiscal Balance Factors of the Local Government: Panel Data Evidence from OECD Countries

Choosing the European fiscal rule

Are fiscal rules efficient on public debt restraint in the presence of shadow economy?

Stability and performance of monetary and fiscal policies in the euro area