Abstract:Background: Many experimentally-derived data sets are generated in the practice of clinical chemistry. Graphical presentation is essential to assess the data distribution. The distribution must also be assessed quantitatively. These approaches will determine if the data is Normal or not. Finally the results of these tests of Normality must be shown to be free of sample size effects. Methods: Four experimentally-derived data sets were used. They represented normal, positive kurtotic, positive- and negatively-skewed distributions. These data sets were examined by graphical techniques, by moment tests, by tests of Normality, and monitored for sample size effects. Results: The preferred graphical techniques are the histogram and the box-and-whisker plots that may be supplemented, with advantage, by quantile-quantile or probability-probability plots. Classical tests of skewness and kurtosis can produce conflicting and often confusing results and, as a consequence, the alternative use of the newer L-moments is advocated. Normality tests included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (Lilliefors modification), Cramér-von Mises and Anderson-Darling tests (empirical distribution function statistics) and the Gan-Koehler, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia, and Filliben tests (regression/correlation techniques). Of these only the Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, and Shapiro-Francia tests correctly classified all four test samples. The effect of sample size on the resulting p-value was investigated using Royston's V'/v' graphical test. Conclusions: A systematic approach to Normality testing should follow the route of graphical presentation, the use of L-moments, the use of Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, or Shapiro-Francia testing, and Royston's sample size monitoring.

On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown

On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for the Exponential Distribution with Mean Unknown

Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test: Overview

Testing for Structural Breaks – A New Self-Normalization Approach Based on the Adjusted Sample Range

Power analysis of several normality tests: A Monte Carlo simulation study

A power comparison of various normality tests

Testing experimental data for univariate normality

Comparing Ratios of the Mean to a Power of Variance in Two Samples Via Self-Normalized Test Statistics

Skewness and kurtosis as criteria of normality in observed frequency distributions

On testing the skew normal distribution by using Shapiro–Wilk test

Shapiro–Wilk-type test of normality under nuisance regression and scale

On Misuses of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for One-Sample Goodness-of-Fit

Test for mean matrix in GMANOVA model under heteroscedasticity and non-normality for high-dimensional data

Normality and significance testing in simple linear regression model for large sample sizes: a simulation study

Kolmogorov-Smirnov type statistics for structural breaks - a new adjusted-range based self-normalization approach

Some p-variate adaptations of the shapiro-wilk test of normality

Detection of Non-Normality in Data Sets and Comparison between Different Normality Tests

Monte Carlo comparison of normality tests based on varentropy estimators

Joint Confidence Sets for the Mean and Variance of a Normal Distribution

Tests for Skewness, Kurtosis, and Normality for Time Series Data

Generalized Spectral Tests for Conditional Mean Models in Time Series with Conditional Heteroscedasticity of Unknown Form