Abstract:BACKGROUND: An explosive increase in couples attending assisted reproductive technology has been recently observed, despite an overall success rate of about 20%-30%. Considering the assisted reproductive technology-related economic and psycho-social costs, the improvement of these percentages is extremely relevant. However, in the identification of predictive markers of assisted reproductive technology success, male parameters are largely underestimated so far.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether conventional semen parameters could predict assisted reproductive technology success.MATERIALS AND METHODS: All couples attending a single third-level fertility center from 1992 to 2020 were retrospectively enrolled, collecting all semen and assisted reproductive technology parameters of fresh cycles. Fertilization rate was the primary end-point, representing a parameter immediately dependent on male contribution. Pregnancy and live birth rates were considered in relation to semen variables. Statistical analyses were performed using the parameters obtained according to the World Health Organization manual editions used for semen analysis.RESULTS: Note that, 22,013 in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were considered. Overall, fertilization rate was significantly lower in patients with abnormal semen parameters compared to normozoospermic men, irrespective of the World Health Organization manual edition. In the in vitro fertilization setting, both progressive motility (p = 0.012) and motility after capacitation (p = 0.002) significantly predicted the fertilization rate (statistical accuracy = 71.1%). Sperm motilities also predicted pregnancy (p < 0.001) and live birth (p = 0.001) rates. In intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles, sperm morphology predicted fertilization rate (p = 0.001, statistical accuracy = 90.3%). Sperm morphology significantly predicted both pregnancy (p < 0.001) and live birth (p < 0.001) rates and a cut-off of 5.5% was identified as a threshold to predict clinical pregnancy (area under the curve = 0.811, p < 0.001).DISCUSSION: Interestingly, sperm motility plays a role in predicting in vitro fertilization success, while sperm morphology is the relevant parameter in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. These parameters may be considered reliable tools to measure the male role on ART outcomes, potentially impacting the clinical management of infertile couples.

Are sperm parameters able to predict the success of assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of over 22,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles

Infertility is a significant clinical issue biomedical approaches for improving assisted pregnancy

A WHO 2021‐based comprehensive scheme outlining sperm parameters' associations with IVF outcomes in PGT‐A cycles

Ensemble machine learning models for sperm quality evaluation concerning success rate of clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive techniques

Advanced Sperm Selection Techniques for Assisted Reproduction

Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction

Predictors of success following IVF

A narrative review of sperm selection technology for assisted reproduction techniques

Correlation of sperm morphology and acrosome index with fertility rate of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

Associations Between Male Reproductive Characteristics and the Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)

Modified Strict Sperm Morphology Threshold Aids in the Clinical Selection of Conventional in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI).

Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome for Infertile Couples Attending Ivf and Icsi Programmes

Relationship Between Donor Sperm Parameters and Pregnancy Outcome after Intrauterine Insemination: Analysis of 2821 Cycles in 1355 Couples

Importance of a semen analysis report for determining the relationship between SCSA sperm DNA fragmentation index and assisted reproductive technology pregnancy rate

Possible predictive factors for ICSI? Molecular biology techniques in combination with therapeutic testicular biopsies

Decreased Sperm Motility Retarded ICSI Fertilization Rate in Severe Oligozoospermia but Good-Quality Embryo Transfer Had Achieved the Prospective Clinical Outcomes

Reproductive outcomes of conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with non-severe male infertility across poor and different sub-optimal ovarian response categories: a cohort study based on 30352 fresh cycles from 2009-2019

Improving success rates by applying interventions in clinical practice and measuring their impact: A multicenter retrospective analysis of more than 240,000 cycles

Follicular Metabolites-Assisted Clinical Evaluation of IVF/ICSI Outcomes

Follicular Metabolites-Assisted Clinical Evaluation of IVF/ICSI Outcomes.

Reproductive Outcomes of Conventional In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients with Non-Severe Male Infertility Across Poor and Different Sub-Optimal Ovarian Response Categories: A Cohort Study Based on 30,352 Fresh Cycles from 2009–2019