Abstract:Since the 1970 s, study from neurophysiology cognitive have found that animals’ position representation and direction representation in navigation tasks have different neural mechanisms. For example, place cells in hippocampus fire selectively in specific locations (O’Keefe&Dostrovsky, 1971), and head-direction cells in the postsubiculcum fire when the animal face specific orientations (Ranck, 1984). These studies have demonstrated the functional division of labor in animals’ cells responsive to different types of representations in space. However, no research has yet focused on the contrast between these two types of representations, and further the development trajectory of position and direction representations. In the present study, two map tasks were used to explore the developmental trajectory of position and direction representations in human children aged from 4 to 6. In each task, two map-to-space problems and two space-to-map problems were resolved by each child, which were conducted in a symmetrical-furnished square room. For the map-to-space problems of the location task, children were asked to indicate their own locations in the room by placing a cylinder object in the map, whereas for the space-to-map problems, they were given a map with a cylinder object in a specific position and asked to go to the corresponding location in the room. In the direction task, children were asked to indicate their orientations by placing a doll facing the corresponding direction in the map (space-to-map problems), or facing the corresponding direction in the room as the doll indicated in the map (map-to-space problems). We found that 4-year-old children began to perform better than chance in the location task. However, children did not show the ability to solve the direction problems until 5 years old. Besides, the 4-year-olds performed better in the pattern of map-to-place in the location task. These results demonstrated that the ability of using map to represent position and that to represent direction were dissociable in the development. Specifically, the ability of representing one’s own location in a map developed earlier than that of representing one’s own direction. Our study provides novel evidence on the dissociation of position representation and direction representation, extending previous neurophysiological studies. Additionally, the benefit of map-to-space pattern suggested that this pattern might provide a better global understanding of spatial relations in map task and favor young children’s location representation when they start to understand map.

The emergence of flexible spatial strategies in young children.

The successful use of a search strategy improves with visuospatial working memory in 2- to 4.5-year-olds

The Development of 2～4 year-old Children's Landmark and Beacon Use for Spatial Orientation in the Video Medium

Young Children's Representation of Geometric Relationships Between Locations in Location Coding.

Cue Learning and Place Learning in Children’ s Spatial Location Coding in a Rotation Task

Older Adults Show Reduced Spatial Precision but Preserved Strategy-Use During Spatial Navigation Involving Body-Based Cues

Development of spatial memory consolidation: A comparison between children and adults

The effects of spatial stability and cue type on spatial learning: Implications for theories of parallel memory systems

A Study of Young Children's Spatial Location Coding Ability in A Rotation Task

The development of retrieval strategies in young children

Age differences in spatial memory for mediated environments.

Contextual cueing in older adults: Slow initial learning but flexible use of distractor configurations

The development of working memory spatialization revealed by using the cave paradigm in a two-alternative spatial choice

The Development of Self-Position Representation and Self-Orientation Representation in Children's Map Task

The development of self-initiated visuo-spatial working memory

Is Height A Core Geometric Cue for Navigation? Young Children'S Use of Height in Reorientation

Separation of Geometric and Featural Information in Children’s Spatial Representation: Evidence from a Model Selection Task

Spatial Representation Understanding and Use in 3-to 5-Year-Olds

Less spatial exploration is associated with poorer spatial memory in midlife adults

A Study on 3-6 Year-Old children's Cognitive process Clue in Nonstandard Spatial Measurement

Children and Adults Prefer the Egocentric Representation to the Allocentric Representation