Abstract:Background: Reporting conflicts of interest (COI) and sources of sponsorship are of paramount importance in adequately interpreting the results of systematic reviews. Some evidence suggests that there is an influence of COI and sponsorship on the study results. The objectives of this meta-research study were twofold: (a) to assess the reporting of COI and sponsorship statements in systematic reviews published in dentistry in three sources (abstract, journal's website and article's full text) and (b) to assess the associations between the characteristics of the systematic reviews and reporting of COI. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for dental systematic reviews published from database inception to June 2023. We assessed how COI and sponsorship statements were reported in the three sources. We performed a logistic regression analysis to assess the associations between the characteristics of the systematic reviews and the reporting of COI. Results: We assessed 924 abstracts published in PubMed and on the corresponding journals´ websites. Similarly, full texts associated with the 924 abstracts were also assessed. A total of 639 (69%) and 795 (88%) studies had no statement of COI in the abstracts on PubMed and the journal's website, respectively. In contrast, a COI statement was reported in 801 (87%) full texts. Sponsorship statements were not reported in 911 (99%) and 847 (93%) abstracts published in PubMed and a journal´s website, respectively. Nearly two-thirds of the full-text articles (N = 607) included sponsorship statements. Journal access was significantly associated with COI statement reporting in all three sources. Open-access journals have significantly higher odds to report COI in PubMed and full-texts, while have significantly lower odds to report COI in the websites, compared with subscription or hybrid journals. Abstract type was significantly associated with COI statement reporting on the journal's website and in the full text. Review registration based on the full text and the number of authors were significantly associated with COI statement reporting in PubMed and in the full texts. Several other variables were found to be significantly associated with COI statement reporting in one of the three sources. Conclusions: COI and sponsorship statements seem to be underreported in the abstracts and homepage of the journals, compared to the full-texts. These results were particularly more pronounced in abstracts published in both the PubMed database and the journals' websites. Several characteristics of systematic reviews were associated with COI statement reporting.

Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals

Accuracy of Conflicts in Interest in General Surgical Journals

Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study

Content and strength of conflict of interest policies at Scandinavian medical schools: a cross sectional study

Differences in the reporting of conflicts of interest and sponsorships in systematic reviews with meta-analyses in dentistry: an examination of factors associated with their reporting

Editors handle their collaborators' submissions despite explicit policies

Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial

Adoption of the voluntary conflict of interest statement on PubMed

Relationships among commercial practices and author conflicts of interest in biomedical publishing

Editors and Authors of Medical Journals Should Be Mindful of the New ICMJE Disclosure Form and Updated Policies

Managing conflicts of interest in the development of health guidelines

Disclosing and Managing Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Publications

Inadequate conflict of interest policies at most French teaching hospitals: A survey and website analysis

Conflict of Interest Disclosure in Oncology: Preliminary Insights From the Global ONCOTRUST-1 Cross-Sectional Study

Open access policies of leading medical journals: a cross-sectional study

Policies of biomedical preprint servers on conflicts of interest, authorship, and research integrity lacked important details

Policies on doctors' declaration of interests in medical organisations: a thematic analysis

SAGES perspective: professional medical associations, commercial interests, and conflicts of interest

Payments by US pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers to US medical journal editors: retrospective observational study

Safeguarding Scientific Integrity: Examining Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review Process

Financial Conflict-of-Interest Policies in U.S Medical Research