Abstract:Face recognition is not rooted in a universal eye movement information-gathering strategy. Western observers favor a local facial feature sampling strategy, whereas Eastern observers prefer sampling face information from a global, central fixation strategy. Yet, the precise qualitative (the diagnostic) and quantitative (the amount) information underlying these cultural perceptual biases in face recognition remains undetermined. To this end, we monitored the eye movements of Western and Eastern observers during a face recognition task, with a novel gaze-contingent technique: the Expanding Spotlight. We used 2 Gaussian apertures centered on the observers' fixations expanding dynamically at a rate of 1 degrees every 25 ms at each fixation the longer the fixation duration, the larger the aperture size. Identity-specific face information was only displayed within the Gaussian aperture; outside the aperture, an average face template was displayed to facilitate saccade planning. Thus, the Expanding Spotlight simultaneously maps out the facial information span at each fixation location. Data obtained with the Expanding Spotlight technique confirmed that Westerners extract more information from the eye region, whereas Easterners extract more information from the nose region. Interestingly, this quantitative difference was paired with a qualitative disparity. Retinal filters based on spatial-frequency decomposition built from the fixations maps revealed that Westerners used local high-spatial-frequency information sampling, covering all the features critical for effective face recognition (the eyes and the mouth). In contrast, Easterners achieved a similar result by using global low-spatial-frequency information from those facial features. Our data show that the face system flexibly engages into local or global eye movement strategies across cultures, by relying on distinct facial information span and culturally tuned spatially filtered information. Overall, our findings challenge the view of a unique putative process for face recognition.

Variants of independence in the perception of facial identity and expression.

The Process of Category-and-Specific-Identity Information Retrieval in Face Perception

Expression Dependence in the Perception of Facial Identity

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

General recognition theory with individual differences: a new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception

Mapping Face Recognition Information Use across Cultures.

Multidimensional signal detection modeling reveals Gestalt-like perceptual integration of face emotion and identity.

Unconscious social integration: seeing social interactions between two invisible people

Face shape and motion are perceptually separable: Support for a revised model of face processing

Priming Global and Local Processing of Composite Faces: Revisiting the Processing-Bias Effect on Face Perception

What Expression Could Be Found More Quickly? It Depends on Facial Identities

The Interactions Between Multiple Social Subcategories in Facial Recognition

On the Role of Sensorimotor Experience in Facial Expression Perception

Interaction between social categories in the composite face paradigm.

Self Identity in Sociocultural Contexts: Implications from Studies of Self-face Recognition

Varying Facial Expressions in Studies of Interpersonal Judgements and Pedestrian Lighting

Inversion effects reveal dissociations in facial expression of emotion, gender, and object processing

The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory*

Learning a face space for experiments on human identity

The effect of face masks and sunglasses on identity and expression recognition with super-recognizers and typical observers

Toward Identity-Invariant Facial Expression Recognition: Disentangled Representation via Mutual Information Perspective