Abstract:According to the territorial-regional development policy of Russia, a rigid structuring of the country's space is applied through the prism of a hierarchical management system. As a result, the structure of the space of the entire country was fixed through a system of boundaries, the markers of which highlight management objects at the national level, subject of the Russian Federation, territory, region, district. This article will present the main stereotypes that influence the creation of the perception of new territories in the nature of marginality. As is known, the formation of marginal communities can be traced throughout the history of civilizations. It is important to separate geographical marginality from spatial marginality. In geography, there is the concept of “marginal territories”, which can be considered those located on the remote periphery of the region or in isolated places. Such a phenomenon as spatial marginality is characterized precisely by the prevailing stereotypes in society about a specific area. Urban spatial perception critically influences human behavior and emotional responses, emphasizing the need to align urban spaces with human needs to improve the quality of urban life. However, the classification of urban architecture based on functionality is subject to biases stemming from discrepancies between objective representation and subjective perception. These biases can lead to city planning and designs that fail to adequately meet the needs and preferences of city residents, negatively impacting their quality of life and the overall functionality of the city. In this study, we apply machine learning to uncover these biases in urban spatial perception research using a three-step methodology: objective mapping, subjective perception analysis, and perceptual bias assessment. Our results show that machine learning can reveal hidden patterns in this area of research with significant implications for urban planning and design. Of particular note, the study found significant discrepancies in the distribution centroids between commercial buildings and residential or public buildings. This result sheds light on the spatial organization characteristics of urban architectural functions, serving as a valuable guide for urban planning and development. Moreover, it reveals the advantages and disadvantages of different data sources and methods for interpreting urban spatial perception, paving the way to a more complete understanding of the subject. These results highlight the importance of integrating both objective mapping and subjective perspectives when classifying the functionality of urban architecture.

Social marginalization in regions of Siberia and Far East of Russia: Factors, Features, Trends

Basic conditions of the Russian Far East territories’ development: on the issue of regional disparity

[Epidemiology, clinical aspects and prevention of borderline conditions in the regions of Siberia and Far East]

SOCIAL DISTANCES AS A FEATURE OF THE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN SOCIAL SPACE

On the Main Factors of Socio-Economic and Economic Development of Modern Russia

Center-peripheral differences in life expectancy in Russia: a regional analysis

POVERTY IN RUSSIA: REGIONAL FEATURES AND PROSPECTS FOR POVERTY REDUCTION INSTRUMENTS

Deprivation factors for the elderly in the social-labor sphere: A regional aspect

Evolution characteristics of temporal and spatial pattern of Russian economic differences since the 21st century

Methodology for regional assessment of the third level digital inequality

Regions with Low Financial Sustainability: Analysis and Enhancement of Development

The impact of economic, social and environmental factors on life satisfaction in the Russian regions

Analysis of digital maturity of the Russian regions

Modeling social ecological economic relations as an assessment method for sustainable development of regions in the Russian Federationский

Stereotypical ideas in the perception of spatial marginality of urban outskirts

Catching-up regional strategy as a tool to reduce spatial inequality

The Dynamics of the Modernization Development of Russian Regions: Scientific and Technological Imbalances Against the Background of General Progress

Households at Risk of Poverty: Regional Aspect

Analysis of Regional Cluster Structure By Principal Components Modelling in Russian Federation

Digital Space of Regions: Assessment of Development Factors and Influence on Socio-Economic Growth

Farmland marginalization in the mountainous areas: Characteristics, influencing factors and policy implications