Abstract:Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the visible and near-infrared wavelength ranges has potential to provide high resolution, pollution-free, and nondestructive estimation of soil chemical and physical properties for use in precision agriculture. Practical implementation of this approach would be facilitated if soil property sensors using a limited number of reflectance bands could maintain accuracy similar to more expensive and complex full spectrum sensors. Studies identifying such bands are limited, especially for subsurface soils. Thus, in this study, an existing spectral database of 697 soil samples was used to compare results for three soil categories (profile, surface, and subsurface) and multiple waveband selection methods. Soil cores were obtained to approximately 1.2 m depth from ten fields, two each in Missouri, Illinois, Michigan, South Dakota, and Iowa, USA, then sieved and air-dried. Laboratory soil spectra were obtained from 350 to 2500 nm using a commercial spectrometer and soil properties (total nitrogen, soil organic carbon, total carbon, magnesium, calcium, potassium, soil texture (clay, silt, and sand) fractions, cation exchange capacity, and pH) were measured using standard laboratory analyses. The ability of ten spectral preprocessing techniques to improve analysis results was investigated. Backward interval partial least squares was used to identify those spectral regions most predictive of soil properties. Alternatively, specific characteristic wavelengths were identified by a combination genetic algorithm (GA)-back propagation neural network (BPNN) approach. Results were compared for three soil property estimation methods: (1) partial least squares regression (PLSR) models based on the full spectrum, (2) PLSR models based on sensitive regions, and (3) BPNN models based on characteristic wavelengths. The best results for profile and subsurface soils were obtained with absorbance preprocessing, but for the surface soils, the standard normal variate transformation was best. For some soil properties, the prediction R2 of the PLSR models based on sensitive regions was better than that of the PLSR models based on the full spectrum, demonstrating that retaining only sensitive wavebands could improve estimates. However, in some cases, the reduction in wavebands decreased accuracy. Differences in prediction accuracy across all calibration models over profile and subsurface soils were relatively small but were larger for surface soils. Furthermore, application of characteristic wavelength calibrations to other soil datasets resulted in a lower accuracy than with the full spectrum calibration developed for that dataset. In general, this study shows that there are measurable differences in prediction accuracy across all calibration models over the three soil depth categories. The experimental results of this study illustrate the potential for a set of wavelengths optimized for one depth category to still provide acceptable estimates for other depth categories. Overall, these results provide important guidance for the development of DRS soil sensors based on discrete wavebands to reduce cost and increase the speed of in-field data collection.

Estimating soil chemical properties by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: Promise versus reality

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for estimating soil properties: a technology for the 21st century

Soil Properties Prediction for Precision Agriculture Using Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties

The Performance of Visible, Near-, and Mid-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Prediction of Soil Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties

Soil Phosphorus and Potassium Estimation by Reflectance Spectroscopy

Extraction of Reflectance Spectra Features for Estimation of Surface, Subsurface, and Profile Soil Properties

Comparison of Soil pH and Exchangeable Cation Quantification by Various Wet Methods with Near- and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Prediction

In‐field soil spectroscopy in Vis–NIR range for fast and reliable soil analysis: A review

Assessment of Important Soil Properties Related to Chinese Soil Taxonomy Based on Vis-Nir Reflectance Spectroscopy

Depth‐Specific Prediction of Soil Properties in Situ Using Vis‐nir Spectroscopy

Evaluating the Precision and Accuracy of Proximal Soil vis–NIR Sensors for Estimating Soil Organic Matter and Texture

Visible and near-infrared spectroscopy with chemometrics are able to predict soil physical and chemical properties

Evaluating soil parameters with visible spectroscopy

Assessment of Soil Properties in Situ Using a Prototype Portable MIR Spectrometer in Two Agricultural Fields

Modelling soil carbon fractions with visible near-infrared (VNIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy

Prediction of Soil Macronutrients Content Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy

Prediction of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties by Visible and Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in the Central Amazon

Improving In-Situ Estimation of Soil Profile Properties Using a Multi-Sensor Probe

Prediction of As in Soil with Reflectance Spectroscopy

Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy as a High Throughput Method for Quantifying Soil C and N and Their Distribution in Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Matter Fractions