Abstract:The enormous environmental impact of construction is becoming increasingly apparent and unacceptable to many structural engineers, whose designs typically account for the majority of a building's embodied carbon. It is timely, therefore, that consensus is forming around a methodology for calculating embodied carbon. This encourages the inclusion of all life cycle stages, from material production and construction, through use and eventual demolition, disposal and reuse. In practice, however, end-of-life processes are fraught with uncertainty and often ignored, despite the potentially large associated carbon fluxes. Further uncertainty exists when considering bio-based construction materials, which store carbon during use. There are no widely-accepted means of accounting for timing of these carbon fluxes, despite the long service life of most buildings. Could we consider whole-life carbon in a more holistic and climate-focused way?This article uses dynamic life cycle assessment to convert greenhouse gas emission histories to key climate impacts using a simple dynamic model. The implications for structural design decisions are explored by comparing concrete, steel and timber options for a typical medium-rise building structure. Concrete is found to have a higher impact than steel, with the climate response of both options dominated by the large initial emissions of material production and construction. Timber has the smallest impact, for this example, under a typical scenario with sustainable forest management and re-emission of sequestered carbon at end-of-life. The analysis takes a forward-looking approach to sequestration, with timing corresponding to the growth of replanted trees. An optimistic timber scenario, whereby future carbon-capture technology avoids most end-of-life emissions, demonstrates the possibility of structures with small long-term climate cooling effects. Conversely, in a hypothetical worst-case scenario where no replanting or subsequent sequestration occurs, the long-term warming effect of the timber structure is increased by the net emission of biogenic carbon.Although end-of-life processes are important in the long-term, particularly for timber, the analysis also highlights the importance of the initial emissions from material production and construction. These cause high rates of short-term temperature increase and prolonged accumulation of radiative heat for all the buildings, but the impacts are again lowest for timber.Most importantly, the investigation shows how dynamic life cycle assessment can be used to explore climate impacts in a comprehensive, graphical and unbiased way. As a simple extension to established methodologies for calculating embodied carbon, it is a powerful decision making tool in the climate emergency.

Embodied Environmental Burdens of Wood Structure in Taiwan Compared with Reinforced Concrete and Steel Structures with Various Recovery Rates

Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of a High-Rise Mass Timber Building: A Case Study in Pacific Northwestern United States

Life Cycle Assessment of Different Prefabricated Rates for Building Construction

Exploring Embodied Carbon Comparison in Lightweight Building Structure Frames: A Case Study

Life-Cycle Assessment of an Office Building: Influence of the Structural Design on the Embodied Carbon Emissions

Life Cycle Assessment of the Construction Process in a Mass Timber Structure

Quantitative Assessment on Carbon Emission of Different Structures in Building Life Cycle

Economic and environmental life cycle perspectives on two engineered wood products: comparison of LVL and GLT construction materials

Life Cycle Assessment of the Environmental Benefits of Using Wood Products and Planting Trees at an All-Electric University Laboratory

A Case Study on the Impact of Transportation of Mass Timber Products on the Cradle-to-Gate LCA Results for an Institutional Building

Embodied carbon assessment using a dynamic climate model: Case-study comparison of a concrete, steel and timber building structure

Whole‐life embodied carbon in multistory buildings: Steel, concrete and timber structures

Quantitative Assessment of the Embodied Environmental Impact of Wood Products

Embodied Environmental Impact Assessments of Urban Residential Buildings in China Based on Life Cycle Analyses

A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia

A Comparative Study on the Life Cycle Assessment of New Zealand Residential Buildings

Assessment of the environmental impact of timber and its potential to mitigate embodied GHG emissions

Life cycle assessment of mass timber construction: A review

Environmental-cost framework to investigate impacts of carbon tax policy on material selection for building structures

Comparative life cycle assessment of light frame timber and reinforced concrete masonry structural systems for single-family houses in Luxembourg

Decarbonization possibilities for affordable wood-framed houses in the south of the US. Comparison of conventional, circular, and regenerative options