Policy transfer, regeneration legacy and the summer Olympic Games: lessons for London 2012 and beyond

Jon Coaffee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.693518
2013-07-01
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
Abstract:The hosting of major sporting events, often linked to elite sports development systems, has become a key determinant of urban and state promotion as well as related policy objectives, notably around enhancing levels of physical activity, and stimulating the social, economic and environmental regeneration of host cities – commonly now referred to as ‘legacy’. What is noticeable about such major event bidding documents and subsequent market analysis and government rhetoric regarding the rationale for, and likely successes of, hosting major sporting events is the adoption of a set of uncritical but standardized justifications regarding the benefits that such events will bring to the host community and nation. Commonly, it is argued that such legacy will ensue simply because it has been evident at prior events around the globe. Within this context and with specific reference to the summer Olympiad to be held in London in 2012, this article unpacks some of the difficulties that occur when mega-event policy is transferred, often uncritically from city to city and nation to nation. After situating this article within the context of ongoing political science debates regarding the efficiency and efficacy of ‘policy transfer’, especially within recent and contemporary UK sports policy context, this article focuses upon how a number of paradoxes have emerged through attempts to deliver Olympic legacy that highlights a number of shortcomings, especially with regard to financial and democratic accountability, and the likelihood of regeneration legacies that benefit local people.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?