TP6.2.5 Post-operative recovery following emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a need to redefine the consent for emergency cholecystectomy

James Lucocq,Ganesh Radhakishnan,John Scollay,Pradeep Patil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab362.035

2021-10-01

Abstract:Abstract Aims Understanding the risks of emergency LC is necessary before patients can make an informed decision regarding operative management. Our primary aim was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the post-operative course of these patients. Methods Emergency LC performed for all biliary pathology across three surgical units between January 2015 and January 2020 were included. We followed each patient up for 100 days postoperatively and data was collected retrospectively. Data collected included demographic data, operative data, post-operative recovery, imaging, additional interventions and re-admissions. Results A total of 605 patients were identified (median age, 53 years (range 13-92); M:F, 1:2.7). 36.9% of patients had a complicated postoperative period, either suffering a significant complication, requiring prolonged post-operative stay (>3 days), further imaging, additional interventions or re-admission. The rate of complication was 13.5% (including retained stones 3.5%; collections 3.8%; bile leaks 3.3%). The rate of prolonged post-operative stay was 25.1%. 16.2% required postoperative imaging and 6.1% required post-operative intervention.12.9% were re-admitted for assessment related to the LC. The rate of bile duct injury was 0% (0/605). Conclusions Although LC has the reputation of largely an uncomplicated procedure, our data illustrates the substantive morbidity associated with emergency LC. Patients should be counselled about the high morbidity rates. This involves patient education and will improve consent which should help decrease litigation. Surgeons should take a more selective and pragmatic approach when offering the procedure.

surgery