Abstract 4652: Urinary levels of the tobacco-specific carcinogen N′-nitrosonornicotine and its glucuronide are strongly associated with esophageal cancer risk in smokers in the Shanghai Cohort Study

Jian-Min Yuan,Aleksandar D. Knezevich,Renwei Wang,Yu-Tang Gao,Stephen S. Hecht,Irina Stepanov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-4652
2011-04-15
Epidemiology
Abstract:Abstract Background: Experimental studies have shown that the tobacco-specific nitrosamine N′-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) can induce esophageal cancer in rats. However, epidemiological data that directly link NNN to esophageal cancer in humans have been lacking. Methods: A nested case-control study of esophageal cancer including 77 cases and 223 individually matched control subjects within the Shanghai Cohort Study was conducted to examine the association between urinary NNN and risk of developing esophageal cancer among male current smokers. Besides urinary creatinine (Cr) and total cotinine, urinary free NNN and its pyridine-N-glucuronide (NNN-N-Gluc) were quantified separately for each study sample by liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry. A conditional logistic regression method was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for esophageal cancer associated with elevated urinary NNN. All P values reported were two-sided. Results: Esophageal cancer patients had significantly higher urinary levels of free NNN (geometric mean 58.2 fmol/mg Cr), NNN-N-Gluc (49.8 fmol/mg Cr) and the sum of the two, referred to as total NNN (117.9 fmol/mg Cr), than control subjects (geometric means 18.2, 24.4, and 45.1 fmol/mg Cr, respectively) whereas the ratio of NNN-N-Gluc to total NNN was significantly lower in cancer patients (46.7%) than controls (56.4%) (all P's < 0.0001). Compared with the lowest quartile, ORs (95% CIs) for esophageal cancer for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles of free NNN were 2.61 (0.80-8.55), 5.74 (1.67-19.75), and 30.64 (7.70-121.93), respectively, after adjustment for smoking intensity and duration (Ptrend < 0.0001). Additional adjustment for urinary cotinine strengthened the association, and ORs (95% CIs) became 4.46 (1.14-17.41), 13.83 (3.21-59.53) and 128.22 (19.9-826.7) (Ptrend < 0.0001). In contrast, the ratio of NNN-N-Gluc to total NNN was inversely associated with esophageal cancer risk. The smoking-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles were 0.43 (0.20-0.96), 0.23 (0.09-0.56) and 0.20 (0.08-0.50), respectively, compared with the lowest quartile (Ptrend =0.0002). Additional adjustment for urinary total cotinine did not materially alter the observed ORs. Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that the tobacco-specific nitrosamine NNN plays a significant role as a cause of esophageal cancer in smokers. In contrast, the glucuronidation of NNN may protect against the development of tobacco-related esophageal cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4652. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4652
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?