Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Chinese version of the School Bullying Experience Questionnaire

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents

Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in A College Student Sample

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Validation of the Actually Received Support Scale for Chinese Adolescents Experiencing School Bullying

Measuring Adolescent Psychopathology: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in A Sample of Chinese Adolescents

Reliability and Validity of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in Chinese Adolescents

Adaptation and Validation of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire with and for Chinese Adolescents.

The Responses to Stress Questionnaire: Construct Validity and Prediction of Depressive and Social Anxiety Symptoms in A Sample of Chinese Adolescents

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Reliability and Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire's Self-report Version for Adolescents

Validation of the Self-Regulation Scale in Chinese Children

Reliability and Validity of Short Version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale for Children in Chinese Middle School Students

Psychometric Properties of the Abbreviated Version of the Dual School Climate and School Identification Measure–Student (SCASIM-St15) among Adolescents in China

Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Touch Questionnaire in Chinese Adolescents

Psychometric properties of a Mandarin Chinese version of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 among Chinese adolescents

Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Affective Lability Scale-Short Form in Chinese Adolescents

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Coping Strategies for Victims of Cyberbullying Scale.

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Achenbach Youth Self-Report(2001 Version)

Application of Chinese Version of the Self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnair in a Sample of 832 Adolescents

Adaptation and validation of BullyHARM-China—a Chinese version of the Bullying, Harassment, and Aggression Receipt Measure