Abstract:Background Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative method which applies mathematical and statistical tools to evaluate the inter-relationships and impacts of publications, authors, institutions and countries in a specific research area. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) are summaries of the best available evidence to address a specific research question via comprehensively literature search, in-depth analysis and synthesis of results. To date, there have been several studies summarizing the publication trends of SRMAs in research specialties, however, none has conducted specifically in ophthalmology. The purpose of this study is to establish the scientometric landscape of SRMAs published in the field of ophthalmology over time. Methods We retrieved relevant ophthalmological SRMAs and the corresponding bibliometric parameters during 2000 to 2020 from Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analysis was performed using bibliometrix package. Pre-registration and guideline compliance of each article was independently assessed by two investigators. Results A total of 2,660 SRMAs were included, and the average annual growth rate was 21.26%. China and the United States were the most productive countries, while Singapore was the country with the highest average citations per document. Wong TY was not only the most productive, but also the most frequently cited author. The most productive affiliation was National University of Singapore ( n = 236). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses output in most subspecialties had steadily increased with retina/vitreous ( n = 986), glaucoma ( n = 411) and cornea/external diseases ( n = 303) constantly as the most dominant fields. Rates of pre-registration and guideline compliance had dramatically increased over time, with 20.0 and 63.5% of article being pre-registered and reported guideline in 2020, respectively. However, SRMAs published on ophthalmology journals tended to be less frequently pre-registered and guideline complied than those on non-ophthalmology journals (both p < 0.001). Conclusion The annual output of SRMAs has been rapidly increasing over the past two decades. China and the United States were the most productive countries, whereas Singapore has the most prolific and influential scholar and institution. Raising awareness and implementation of SRMAs pre-registration and guideline compliance is still necessary to ensure quality, especially for ophthalmology journals.

Bibliometric Analysis of Health Services Research in Otolaryngology Journals

A Comparative Analysis of Otolaryngology Journal Characteristics and Metrics Across World Bank Income Groups

Gender Disparities in Academic Otolaryngology

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals

Publication bias in otorhinolaryngology meta-analyses in 2021

Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America

Listening to the Past, Predicting the Future: A Bibliometric Exploration of Hearing Loss Publications Over Four Decades

Exploring Diversity in North American Academic Pediatric Otolaryngology

Gender, Racial, and Academic Authorship Diversity in the Otolaryngology Clinical Trial Literature

A global landscape analysis of the impact, trends, and dissemination in oral and maxillofacial surgery research

Race and Ethnicity in Otolaryngology Academic Publications

Assessing Academic Preferential Hiring Practices in Highly Ranked Otolaryngology Departments

The World's consumption of free web‐based Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery educational resources: A global assessment of video usage trends

Trends in Twitter Utilization Among Academic Otolaryngologists

The Global Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Workforce

Disparities in health in the United States: An overview of the social determinants of health for otolaryngologists

Trends of Rising Research Production Among Otolaryngology Residency Applicants

Outcomes of Short-Term Surgical Trips in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review

A scoping review of Rasch analysis and item response theory in otolaryngology: Implications and future possibilities

Network Analysis of Women in Otolaryngology and Demographic Trends

A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ophthalmology