Abstract:The Stroop effect is referred to the failure to focus exclusively on the target dimension of a stimulus,because of the task-irrelevant dimension of the same stimulus.For example,when naming the print color of color words,people seem unable to prevent processes of reading even when such processes are irrelevant to the task at hand and can hurt performance.While,the emotional Stroop effect is defined as the interference between emotional information and the non-emotional information of the same stimulus.For example,usually,people read or name the color of emotionally charged words or threat words both are slower than neutral words. There are two different views on the relationship between the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect.One is the selective attention mechanism,which argues that the emotional Stroop is a variant of the Stroop paradigm.It assumes that both the Stroop and the emotional Stroop effects document the failure of fully selective focusing on target dimension of the stimuli.The other account is the threat-driven mechanism,which postulates that the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect are two independent and different phenomena.The competing account attributes the emotional delay to a threat-driven generic slowdown,but not a selective attention mechanism associated with the classic Stroop effect.To resolve the controversy,this study was to explore the relationship between the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect at the level of latent variables.The latent variable approach is highly theory-driven and can alleviate the task impurity problem.Therefore,this latent variable approach has several important advantages over a more common approach of relying on zero-order correlations and Exploratory Factor Analysis,particularly in the context of studying the relationship between the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect. In present study,133 undergraduates,from 17 to 23 years old,attended six tasks respectively.All participants didn' t know the purpose of the experiment and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision.Stimulus presentation and data collection were controlled by a Founder microcomputer running E-prime software. In this study,we used three tasks to assess the Stroop effect.In the location-decision task,participants were instructed to decide the location of the stimuli.In the picture-word interference task,participants were asked to name the pictures.In the color word interference task,participants were required to name the color of the stimuli.In the above three tasks,participants were instructed to ignore the semantic information of the stimuli. Similarly,in this study,we used three tasks to evaluate the emotional Stroop effect.In the emotional facial gender-decision task, participants were asked to judge the gender of the emotional faces.In the affective lexical decision task,participants were instructed to decide the lexical stimuli either true words or non-words.In the affective picture color-naming task,participants were required to name the color of the frames of the pictures.In the above three tasks,participants were asked to ignore the emotional information of the stimuli. Then,we calculated the Stroop effect size and the emotional Stroop effect size,and explored the relationship between the two effects at the level of latent variables through the method of Confirmatory Factor Analysis.The results showed:(1) There were significant Stroop interferences and emotional Stroop interferences among participants.(2) The emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect were two independent and different phenomena.In summary,these results provided further evidence for the threat-driven mechanism.The emotional Stroop effect was caused by a threat-driven generic slowdown,rather than a selective attention mechanism associated with the classic Stroop effect.

Is emotional Stroop interference linked to affective responses? Evidence from skin conductance and facial electromyography.

Anxiety, emotional distraction, and attentional control in the Stroop task.

Is Selective Attention in Anxiety Characterised by Biased Attentional Engagement with or Disengagement from Threat: Evidence from a Colour-Naming Paradigm

Individual differences in the evaluation of ambiguous visual and auditory threat‐related expressions

Trait-Anxious People Take Longer to Search for Happy Faces in the Presence of Neutral and Fearful Distractors

The Relationship Between the Emotional Stroop Effect and the Stroop Effect

Electrophysiological correlates of social anxiety modulating the effect of emotion on cognitive control

The Emotional Stroop Effect is Modulated by the Biological Salience and Motivational Intensity Inherent in Stimuli

Investigating the Neural Correlates of Emotion–Cognition Interaction Using an Affective Stroop Task

Influence of Arousal in Emotional Stroop Effect

The influence of emotional interference on cognitive control: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies using the emotional Stroop task

Neural and Behavioral Evidence for Affective Priming from Unconsciously Perceived Emotional Facial Expressions and the Influence of Trait Anxiety

Trait Anxiety Influences Negative Affect-modulated Distribution of Visuospatial Attention

Effects of Emotion on Cognitive Processing: Series of Event-Related Potentials Study

Emotion and anxiety interact to bias spatial attention.

Time course of processing emotional stimuli as a function of perceived emotional intelligence, anxiety, and depression.

Attentional bias to threat: an investigation of psychological predictors beyond trait anxiety

The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.

The influence of positive and negative affect on emotional attention

Electrophysiological evidence of attentional biases in social anxiety disorder

Skin Conductance and Subjective Arousal in Anxiety, Depression, and Comorbidity: Implications for Affective Reactivity