Abstract:IntroductionSelf Determination Theory (SDT) suggests that the satisfaction of the basic psychological needs contributes tostudents’ intrinsic motivation as well as a deep approach to learning (Ryan and Deci, 2000; Baeten, Kyndt, Struyven,& Dochy, 2010). In our study, we used the SDT framework to evaluate and redesign a large basic course of Historyand Ethics for first year engineering students.MethodsWe conducted cluster analysis to understand how different combinations of students’ satisfaction of autonomy andcompetence are related to intrinsic motivation, perception of learning, perceived value of the course and overallsatisfaction with it. Questionnaires exploring all abovementioned variables were administered to the students at theend of the course. The sample consisted of 565 students. In addition, in depth interviews with 12 students wereconducted using the SDT framework to explore students’ perceptions of the learning environment and the factorsthey considered as supportive to their autonomy and competence. The qualitative data were analyzed thematically.ResultsThree clusters were derived based on students’ satisfaction of autonomy and competence: a low, a medium and ahigh satisfaction cluster. Follow-up post hoc tests showed that these clusters differed significantly across alldependent variables. Students in the high satisfaction cluster, reported significantly higher intrinsic motivation, atransformative approach to learning, more appreciation and satisfaction with the course. The qualitative study alsoindicated that students value the possibility to formulate groups and choose the project theme as indicators ofautonomy. Perceived competence was enhanced via structured feedback activities, sufficient time allocated toexercises, clarity of learning objectives and study material. Other important factors for students’ intrinsic motivationsuggested by the qualitative study was the perceived relevance and value of the course for students’ professionalidentity as engineers.DiscussionOur study confirms that satisfaction of students’ perceived autonomy and competence plays an important role intheir intrinsic motivation, approach to learning and course satisfaction. We will discuss in detail the findings of thecluster analysis and we will provide suggestions for educational changes in the learning environment that supportstudents’ basic psychological needs.ReferencesBaeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulatedeep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational ResearchReview, 5(3), 243–260.Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, socialdevelopment, and well-being, American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

Revisiting approaches to learning in science and engineering: a case study

Design science research for learning software engineering and computational thinking: Four cases

The Types of Learning Approaches Used by Engineering Students in Three Scenarios: An Adaptation of the R-SPQ-2F to China

Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy?

Do Students Develop Towards More Deep Approaches to Learning During Studies? A Systematic Review on the Development of Students’ Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education

Student learning approaches in the UAE: the case for the achieving domain

Moving beyond the deep and surface dichotomy; using Q Methodology to explore students’ approaches to studying

Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness

Evaluating the Dynamics of Learning Approaches: A Systematic Review Investigating the Nexus Between Teaching Methods and Academic Performance in Medical and Dental Education

Investigating student approaches to scenario-based assessments of systems thinking

Interrelations between self‐efficacy and learning approaches: a developmental approach

Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes

Language, culture and approaches to studying: towards a more comprehensive 3P Model; a cross-cultural study of the 3P Model in university students

Validity concerns with the Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) in undergraduate anatomy & physiology students

Approaches to studying among Greek university students: the impact of gender, age, academic discipline and handedness

Course design, teaching method and student epistemology

Fostering intrinsic motivation in engineering education : a cluster analysis of engineering students’ basic psychological needs

Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions

Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers

Surface and deep learning: a blended learning approach in preclinical years of medical school

Researching Student Learning in Higher Education: A social realist approach