Dimensions of sustainable value chains: implications for value chain analysis

Andrew Fearne,Marian Garcia Martinez,Benjamin Dent

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211269193

2012-09-21

Abstract:Purpose Value chain analysis (VCA) can expose strategic and operational misalignments within chains, and the consequential misallocation of resources, and hence opportunities for improvements which create value and economic sustainability. This paper's purpose is to argue why and how VCA needs to integrate the social and environmental aspects of sustainability in pursuit of sustainable competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach Based on a review of existing methods and case studies, the paper proposes three dimensions of VCA, which illustrate the flaws in narrow tools, and the need to broaden the boundaries of VCA, the interpretation of “value” and relationships along the chain in order to highlight opportunities for creating sustainable value chains. Findings To date VCA has largely focused on economic sustainability and paid inadequate attention to social and environment consequences of firm behaviour and the (re) allocation of resources within and between firms in the chain. This risks producing recommendations which either ignore the competitive advantage offered from improving environmental management and social welfare, or have such detrimental external consequences as to render any proposals unsustainable when exposed to government or broader (public) scrutiny. Research limitations/implications VCA variants need to be developed which incorporate all three pillars of sustainability. Some initial experiences are presented and ideas for future research and applications proposed. Practical implications The development of sustainable VCA tools should identify business opportunities consistent with Porter and Kramer's imperative for value chains to create shared value between business and society. Originality/value Adopting the broader dimensions identified will allow VCA to become more widely applicable, and more relevant in business scenarios where there is a growing imperative to include social and environmental impacts into “mainstream” business strategies.

management,business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to integrate social and environmental sustainability in value chain analysis (VCA) when pursuing sustainable competitive advantage. Specifically, the author points out that the current value chain analysis mainly focuses on economic sustainability, while paying insufficient attention to the impact of corporate behavior and the allocation of resources within and between enterprises on society and the environment. This neglect may lead to the proposed suggestions failing to reflect the competitive advantages brought by improving environmental management and enhancing social welfare, or being unsustainable due to negative external impacts under government or public scrutiny.

To meet this challenge, the paper proposes three dimensions to illustrate the limitations of existing tools and emphasize the need to broaden the boundaries of value chain analysis, the interpretation of value, and the relationships along the chain, thereby revealing opportunities to create sustainable value chains:

1. **Analysis Boundary**: Expand from activities within a single enterprise to the entire supply chain and even external stakeholders, such as governments, non - governmental organizations, and social groups. This reflects that competition is increasingly concentrated between supply chains rather than between single enterprises, and these external stakeholders play an important role in creating value.

2. **Value Range**: Expand from simply reducing costs and waste to considering consumer and customer value, and ultimately reach shared value. Shared value refers to the value that is beneficial to both enterprises and society. It not only increases the competitiveness of enterprises but also improves the overall well - being of society.

3. **Governance**: Change from not considering relationships or only focusing on the application of channel power to evaluating whether an enterprise has the ability to form and maintain unified resources for cooperative relationships. This emphasizes the importance of cooperative relationships for value distribution, which is a way to enhance the social sustainability of the supply chain.

Through the analysis of these three dimensions, the paper aims to make value chain analysis more comprehensive and better applicable to business scenarios that need to incorporate social and environmental impacts into "mainstream" business strategies.