Abstract:Pavement markings are essential elements of transportation infrastructure with critical impacts on safety and mobility. They provide road users with the necessary information to adjust driving behavior or make calculated decisions about commuting. The visibility of pavement markings for drivers can be the boundary between a safe trip and a disastrous accident. Consequently, transportation agencies at the local or national levels allocate sizeable budgets to upkeep the pavement markings under their jurisdiction. Infrastructure asset management systems (IAMS) are often biased toward high-capital-cost assets such as pavements and bridges, not providing structured asset management (AM) plans for low-cost assets such as pavement markings. However, recent advances in transportation asset management (TAM) have promoted an integrated approach involving the pavement marking management system (PMMS). A PMMS brings all data items and processes under a comprehensive AM plan and enables managing pavement markings more efficiently. Pavement marking operations depend on location, conditions, and AM policies, highly diversifying the pavement marking management practices among agencies and making it difficult to create a holistic image of the system. Most of the available resources for pavement marking management focus on practices instead of strategies. Therefore, there is a lack of comprehensive guidelines and model frameworks for developing PMMS. This study utilizes the existing body of knowledge to build a guideline for developing and implementing PMMS. First, by adapting the core AM concepts to pavement marking management, a model framework for PMMS is created, and the building blocks and elements of the framework are introduced. Then, the caveats and practical points in PMMS implementation are discussed based on the US transportation agencies’ experiences and the relevant literature. This guideline is aspired to facilitate PMMS development for the agencies and pave the way for future pavement marking management tools and databases.

Assessing the Maturity of the Asset Lifecycle Management in the Case of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Digital Asset Information Management for Transport Infrastructure: Framework and Implementation

Maturity model of building maintenance management for New Zealand’s state schools

Risk-Based Asset Management Framework for Subway Systems

Integrating lifecycle asset management in the public sector

Summary on the Birth and Development of Transportation Asset Management

Keeping Your Maturity Assessment Alive

The Evaluation of Maturity Level on Heavy Equipment Maintenance Management According to ISO 55001:2014

Measuring Transportation Infrastructure Resilience: Case Study with Amtrak

Gaps in Asset Management Systems to Integrate Railway Companies’ Resilience

Current Asset Management Practices Applied to Pavement Markings

Assessing Technology Implementation Success for Highway Construction and Asset Management

Maturity Assessment of Intelligent Construction Management

Developing Pavement Marking Management Systems: A Theoretical Model Framework Based on the Experiences of the US Transportation Agencies

Geotechnical Asset Management Plan: Analysis of Life-Cycle Cost and Risk

Challenges of integrated multi-infrastructure asset management: a review of pavement, sewer, and water distribution networks

A maturity framework for data driven maintenance

Asset Data Quality—A Case Study on Mobile Mining Assets

Maintenance Framework for Subway Network Systems Using BIM

Asset management in power systems

Design and Application Research on Information Management System of Intelligent Maintenance Equipment in Urban Rail Transit