Abstract:Managers choose to spend corporate resources to purchase directors' and officers' liability insurance, which protects directors and officers from personal financial liability in lawsuits brought against the firm and its directors and officers. We investigate whether the amount of D&O insurance coverage chosen by managers of IPO firms, and the cost of that insurance, is related to post-IPO abnormal stock price performance. If managers of IPO firms are exploiting superior inside information in bringing their companies public when the expected offering price exceeds managers' private valuation estimate, we hypothesize that the amount of insurance coverage chosen will be related to the post-offering performance of the issuing firm's shares. We analyze a sample of 72 IPO firms that went public between 1992 and 1996 for which we have detailed proprietary information about the amount and cost of D&O liability insurance. Consistent with the hypothesis, we find a significant negative relation between the 3-year post-IPO stock price performance and the amount of insurance coverage in place at the IPO date. We also analyze the pricing of D&O insurance by the insurers. Insurers charge more for insurance purchases that are larger than would be predicted by observable business risk proxies. However, insurers pool all abnormal insurance purchases together in that they do not distinguish between those who buy abnormally large insurance based on anticipated poor performance and those who buy extra insurance for other reasons (e.g., abnormally high risk aversion). Insurers do, however, appear to charge more to firms that buy more insurance and are subsequently sued, indicating that insurers are able to identify and price abnormal litigation risk. We argue that, similar to insider securities transactions, D&O insurance decisions reveal the private information of managers. This provides some motivation to argue that disclosure of the details of D&O insurance decisions, as is required in some other countries, is valuable.

Why Large Corporations Purchase Property/Liability Insurance

An Economics Comparative Study on Demands for Property Insurance of Individuals and Companies

Diversification, Financial Leverage and Conglomerate Systematic Risk

Creditor Rights and LBOs

Media Coverage and Corporate Risk-Taking: International Evidence

An Insurance Paradox

Managerial Opportunism? Evidence from Directors' and Officers' Insurance Purchases

Organisational structure, corporate governance and reinsurance decisions in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry

Corporate Social Responsibility and Directors' and Officers' Liability Risk: The Moderating Effect of Risk Environment and Growth Potential

Diversification, Size and Risk: the Case of Bank Acquisitions of Nonbank Financial Firms

Effective factors in corporate demand for insurance: empirical evidence from Iran

Corporate Diversification, Ownership, and Solvency in China’s Property-Liability Insurance Companies

Does reinsurance purchasing enhance insurers’ competitiveness? Evidence from the U.S. property–liability insurance industry

Characteristics of S&P 500 companies with captive insurance subsidiaries

What protects me also makes me behave: The role of directors' and officers' liability insurance on empire-building managers in China

Boardroom gender diversity and risk-taking in the insurance industry: do organizational form and ownership structure matter?

The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis

Asset Pricing of Financial Institutions : The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns in the Property / Liability Insurance Industry

Does directors' and officers' liability insurance induce empire building? Evidence from corporate labor investment

Risk Preferences and Demand Drivers of Extended Warranties

Litigation risk and corporate philanthropy: A managerial perspective analysis