Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Position Paper by an International Panel of Ablation Experts, the Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières Meeting 2013
Alice Gillams,Nahum Goldberg,Muneeb Ahmed,Reto Bale,David Breen,Matthew Callstrom,Min Hua Chen,Byung Ihn Choi,Thierry de Baere,Damian Dupuy,Afshin Gangi,Debra Gervais,Thomas Helmberger,Ernst-Michael Jung,Fred Lee,Riccardo Lencioni,Ping Liang,Tito Livraghi,David Lu,Franca Meloni,Philippe Pereira,Fabio Piscaglia,Hyunchul Rhim,Riad Salem,Constantinos Sofocleous,Stephen B. Solomon,Michael Soulen,Masatoshi Tanaka,Thomas Vogl,Brad Wood,Luigi Solbiati
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3779-z
IF: 7.034
2015-01-01
European Radiology
Abstract:Objectives Previous attempts at meta-analysis and systematic review have not provided clear recommendations for the clinical application of thermal ablation in metastatic colorectal cancer. Many authors believe that the probability of gathering randomised controlled trial (RCT) data is low. Our aim is to provide a consensus document making recommendations on the appropriate application of thermal ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Methods This consensus paper was discussed by an expert panel at The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières 2013. A literature review was presented. Tumour characteristics, ablation technique and different clinical applications were considered and the level of consensus was documented. Results Specific recommendations are made with regard to metastasis size, number, and location and ablation technique. Mean 31 % 5-year survival post-ablation in selected patients has resulted in acceptance of this therapy for those with technically inoperable but limited liver disease and those with limited liver reserve or co-morbidities that render them inoperable. Conclusions In the absence of RCT data, it is our aim that this consensus document will facilitate judicious selection of the patients most likely to benefit from thermal ablation and provide a unified interventional oncological perspective for the use of this technology. Key Points • Best results require due consideration of tumour size, number, volume and location. • Ablation technology, imaging guidance and intra-procedural imaging assessment must be optimised. • Accepted applications include inoperable disease due to tumour distribution or inadequate liver reserve. • Other current indications include concurrent co-morbidity, patient choice and the test-of-time approach. • Future applications may include resectable disease, e.g. for small solitary tumours.