Abstract:Logical frameworks based on intuitionistic or linear logics with higher-type quantification have been successfully used to give high-level, modular, and formal specifications of many important judgments in the area of programming languages and inference systems. Given such specifications, it is natural to consider proving properties about the specified systems in the framework: for example, given the specification of evaluation for a functional programming language, prove that the language is deterministic or that evaluation preserves types. One challenge in developing a framework for such reasoning is that higher-order abstract syntax (HOAS), an elegant and declarative treatment of object-level abstraction and substitution, is difficult to treat in proofs involving induction. In this paper, we present a meta-logic that can be used to reason about judgments coded using HOAS; this meta-logic is an extension of a simple intuitionistic logic that admits higher-order quantification over simply typed lambda-terms (key ingredients for HOAS) as well as induction and a notion of definition. We explore the difficulties of formal meta-theoretic analysis of HOAS encodings by considering encodings of intuitionistic and linear logics, and formally derive the admissibility of cut for important subsets of these logics. We then propose an approach to avoid the apparent tradeoff between the benefits of higher-order abstract syntax and the ability to analyze the resulting encodings. We illustrate this approach through examples involving the simple functional and imperative programming languages PCF and PCF:=. We formally derive such properties as unicity of typing, subject reduction, determinacy of evaluation, and the equivalence of transition semantics and natural semantics presentations of evaluation.

Logic Programming and Burden of Proof in Legal Reasoning

Beyond Logic Programming for Legal Reasoning

A Survey of the Proof-Theoretic Foundations of Logic Programming

When Do Program-of-Thought Works for Reasoning?

Logic As Programming

Arguments Grounded in Cases : A Computational Approach

Reasoning with Higher-Order Abstract Syntax in a Logical Framework

Differentiable Logic Programming for Probabilistic Reasoning

A Survey on Inductive Logic Programming

Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning

ILP Modulo Data

Software Engineering Methods For AI-Driven Deductive Legal Reasoning

Reciprocal Influences Between Proof Theory and Logic Programming

Automated legal reasoning with discretion to act using s(LAW)

Relations, Constraints and Abstractions: Using the Tools of Logic Programming in the Security Industry

A History of Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming

Probabilistic unifying relations for modelling epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty: semantics and automated reasoning with theorem proving

A Synthesis of Logical and Probabilistic Reasoning for Program Understanding and Debugging

Beyond the Grounding Bottleneck: Datalog Techniques for Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs (Technical Report)

Checking the Validity of Rule-Based Arguments Grounded in Cases - A Computational Approach.