Abstract:Objectives: The outward expression of emotion has been frequently associated with better health outcomes, whereas suppressing emotion is thought to contribute to worse physical health. However, work has typically focused on trait expressive tendencies and the possibility that individual differences in the ability to express specific emotions may also be associated with health has not been widely tested. Design: A cross-sectional study of community dwelling adults. Methods: One hundred and twenty-eight participants aged 18-88 years completed questionnaires assessing demographics and health status, before attending a testing session in which resting heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed. Participants then completed a performance-based test of expressive regulatory skill in which they were instructed to enhance and suppress their emotional expressions while they watched film clips validated to elicit amusement, sadness, and anger. Participants rated subjective emotional experience before and after each clip, and their degree of expressivity was scored using FACS-based Noldus FaceReader. Results: Missing data resulted in a final sample size of 117. Linear regressions controlling for age, sex, diagnoses, and trait emotion revealed that greater ability to enhance sad expressions was associated with higher HRV while the ability to enhance expressions of joy was associated with lower symptom interference. In parallel models, the ability to flexibly regulate (both enhance and suppress) expressions of joy and sadness was also associated with lower symptom interference. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the ability to regulate expressions of both sadness and joy is associated with health indices even when controlling for trait affect and potential confounds. The present findings offer early evidence that individual differences in the ability to regulate the outward expression of emotion may be relevant to health and suggest that expressive regulatory skills offer a novel avenue for research and intervention. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject The tendency to outwardly express felt emotion generally predicts better health, whereas expressive suppression typically predicts worse health outcomes. Most work has been based on trait assessments; however, the ability to regulate the expression of felt emotion can be objectively assessed using performance-based tests. Prior work in mental health suggests that the ability to flexibly up- and downregulate the expression of emotion predicts better outcomes. What does this study add The first evidence that the ability to flexibly regulate expressions predicts indices of health. Skill in both expressing and suppressing facial expressions predicts better reported health. Skills with different emotions differentially predict symptom interference and cardiac vagal tone.

Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health.

The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis.

Heritability of Intraindividual Mean and Variability of Positive and Negative Affect.

Neuroticism and Extraversion Are Differentially Related to Between- and Within-Person Variation of Daily Negative Emotion and Physical Symptoms

Emotional (in)stability: Neuroticism is associated with increased variability in negative emotion after all

Emotion Regulation, Parasympathetic Function, and Psychological Well-Being

Reduced positive affect on days with stress exposure predicts depression, anxiety disorders, and low trait positive affect 7 years later.

Longitudinal associations of daily affective dynamics with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms

Low heart rate variability is associated with a negativity valence bias in interpreting ambiguous emotional expressions.

Neuroticism is Associated With Greater Affective Variability at High Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being, but With Lower Affective Variability at Low Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being

Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience.

Mix it to fix it: Emotion regulation variability in daily life.

Variability in Emotion Regulation Strategy Use is Negatively Associated with Depressive Symptoms.

Affective Instability: Impact of Fluctuating Emotions on Regulation and Psychological Well-Being

Predicting Emotional Volatility Using 41,000 Participants in the United Kingdom

Positive Emotions Experienced on Days of Stress are Associated with Less Same-Day and Next-Day Negative Emotion

Role of Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation in Well-being and Health: The Interplay between Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation Abilities is Linked to Mental and Physical Health

Resting vagally‐mediated heart rate variability in the laboratory is associated with momentary negative affect and emotion regulation in daily life

Does the ability to express different emotions predict different indices of physical health? A skill-based study of physical symptoms and heart rate variability

Negative affect instability predicts elevated depressive and generalized anxiety disorder symptoms even when negative affect intensity is controlled for: an ecological momentary assessment study

If it Ain't Broke, Don't Fix it: Positive Versus Negative Emotion Regulation in Daily Life and Depressive Symptoms