The “Meiji Restoration” as Ideal and Failure

Ben Middleton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003207771-15

2021-11-10

Abstract:This chapter offers a conceptual and intellectual history of the master tropes of the “Meiji Restoration.” The complexity of what transpired gave rise to still unresolved problems of cognition and description. In 1910, George Etsujiro Uyehara, writing in English for a Western audience, described how the post-1868 reforms had led to changes “so abrupt and sweeping that the people were bewildered, and called the Restoration ‘Ishin,’ or Novel Innovation.” It is well known that the reign name “Meiji” was proclaimed in October 1868. Loyalist ideologues used these classical texts to express hope for remaking politics after the interregnum of samurai rule. Demands for a “second reformation” first emerged in the struggle against “bureaucratic tyranny” by popular rights activists during the 1870s. Potential misreadings of Italian politics aside, Takekoshi sought parliamentary democracy, constitutional monarchy, and peaceful diplomacy.