Osteoporosis, Nutrition, and the Immune System

Marco Di Monaco
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-652-2_15
2004-01-01
Abstract:Osteoporosis is a condition of low bone mass and microarchitectural disruption, resulting in fractures with minimal trauma. A World Health Organization (WHO) panel recommended that an absolute bone mineral density (BMD) standard should be used to make the diagnosis of the disease: a person whose BMD value falls more than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) below the mean value for a large sample of young-adults is defined as having osteoporosis, whereas individuals whose BMD values fall between 1.0 and 2.5 SD below the mean are defined as having osteopenia (1). Severe or established osteoporosis denotes the disease as defined above in the presence of one or more documented fragility fractures (bone fractures resulting from trauma equal to or less than a fall from a standing position). Currently, this is the internationally agreed definition of osteoporosis, although it presents several problems regarding the validity of its use for men, children, and non-Caucasian populations. It also does not consider the pivotal role exerted by qualitative abnormalities of bone, as well as changes in bone size, geometry, and turnover in causing bone fragility. Moreover, the WHO criteria were established largely with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results in mind. Consequently, the definition should be reserved for BMD assessment by DXA, and uncertainty exists about corresponding thresholds for other techniques employed in BMD measurement and for different body assessment sites. Finally, BMD predicts fracture risk along a continuous, progressive relationship, which is not adequately expressed by one threshold.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?