Abstract:<ol class=""><li>It is now commonplace in community ecology to assess patterns of phylogenetic or functional diversity in order to inform our understanding of the assembly mechanisms that structure communities. While both phylogenetic and functional approaches have been used in conceptually similar ways, it is not clear if they both in fact reveal similar community diversity patterns or support similar inferences. We review studies that use both measures to determine the degree to which they support congruent patterns and inferences about communities.</li><li>We performed a literature review with 188 analyses from 79 published papers that compared some facet of phylogenetic (PD) and functional diversity (FD) in community ecology. These studies generally report four main cases in which phylogenetic and functional information are used together in community analyses, to determine if: (a) there were phylogenetic signals in the measured traits in communities; (b) PD and FD were correlated with one another; (c) standardized PD and FD measures similarly revealed patterns of community over‐ or under‐dispersion; and (d) PD and FD were both related to other explanatory variables (e.g. elevation) similarly.</li><li>We found that the vast majority of studies found both strong phylogenetic signals in their traits and positive correlations of PD and FD measures across sites. However, and surprisingly, we found substantial incongruencies for the other tests. Phylogenetic and functional dispersion patterns were congruent only about half the time. Specifically, when communities were phylogenetically over‐dispersed, these same communities were more likely to be functionally under‐dispersed. Similarly, we found that phylogenetic and functional relationships with independent predictors were incongruent in about half of the analyses.</li><li><i>Synthesis</i>. Phylogenetic signal tests and PD–FD correlations appear to strongly support the congruence between traits and phylogeny. It is surprising that strong phylogenetic signals appeared so ubiquitous given that ecological studies often analyse phylogenetically incomplete sets of species that have undergone ecological sorting. Despite the largely congruent findings based on phylogenetic signal tests and PD‐FD correlations, we found substantial incongruencies when researchers assessed either dispersion patterns or relationships with independent predictors. We discuss a number of potential ecological, evolutionary and methodological reasons for these incongruencies. Phylogenetic and functional information might reflect species ecological differences unequally with phylogenies better reflecting multivariate conserved elements of ecological similarity, and single traits better able to capture recent divergence, and both elements influence ecological patterns. </li></ol>

Should evolutionary history guide conservation?

Quantifying extinction probabilities of endangered species for phylogenetic conservation prioritization may not be as sensitive as might be feared

Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation

Genomic Diversity as a Key Conservation Criterion: Proof‐of‐Concept From Mammalian Whole‐Genome Resequencing Data

Evolutionary history shapes grassland productivity through opposing effects on complementarity and selection

Effects of discordance between species and gene trees on phylogenetic diversity conservation

Implications of gene tree heterogeneity on downstream phylogenetic analyses: A case study employing the Fair Proportion index

Optimal fire histories for biodiversity conservation

Geographical Patterns in Phylogenetic Diversity of Chinese Woody Plants and Its Application for Conservation Planning

Conserving Evolutionary Potential: Combining Landscape Genomics with Established Methods to Inform Plant Conservation

Assessing phylogenetic diversity metrics in terrestrial ecological restoration: global trends and gaps

Identifying optimized on-the-ground priority areas for species conservation in a global biodiversity hotspot

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics

Phylogenetic diversity and biodiversity indices on phylogenetic networks

Poor protection of amphibian evolutionary history reveals opportunities for global protected areas

Using historical and palaeoecological data to inform ambitious species recovery targets

Linking the spatial and genomic structure of adaptive potential for conservation management: a review

Do traits and phylogeny support congruent community diversity patterns and assembly inferences?

Prioritizing global conservation efforts

Genetic diversity and IUCN Red List status

Capability of big data to capture threatened vertebrate diversity in protected areas